Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4041 - 4050 of 66972 for had.

[PDF] State v. John A. Lagrew - 2018AP000227
. The cleaning personnel told the officer that many items inside the home had not yet been gone through
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240694 - 2019-05-14

[PDF] State v. Joseph C. Mente - 2005AP000391
with the dispatcher. After confirming that the vehicle was the same that Carter had described to the dispatcher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18856 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Maurice Clark - 1997AP001013
2 cites as error the trial court’s admission of two threatening letters Clark had written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12328 - 2014-09-15

Richard J. Clapper v. John Ahlf - 2008AP000757
for admissions. The requested admissions included various statements that Ahlf had made misrepresentations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36486 - 2009-05-13

State v. Norman P. Roberts - 2009AP001655
’ motion was that the evidence was fruit of a stop that an Illinois court had previously found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54341 - 2010-09-14

[PDF] State v. Norman P. Roberts - 2009AP001655
had previously found to be illegal. ¶2 Specifically, Roberts argues: that the State waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54341 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] County of Dane v. John S. McKenzie - 2000AP001009
Laboratory. There, he had “the analyst who I physically turn over the sealed kit to” sign a Dane County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2497 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] County of Dane v. John S. McKenzie - 2000AP001010
Laboratory. There, he had “the analyst who I physically turn over the sealed kit to” sign a Dane County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2498 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Gary F. Wieczorek - 2011AP001184
had been unconstitutionally seized. ¶3 At the motion hearing, officer Jason Mork testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73522 - 2014-09-15

Marcia Fenner v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company - 1998AP003657
, the owners had to refinance their farm. Furthermore, during this time, they lost the use of their homestead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14933 - 2005-03-31