Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4041 - 4050 of 68446 for did.
Search results 4041 - 4050 of 68446 for did.
State v. William R. Severson
. He replied that he did not. At that time, she noticed that his eyes were bloodshot. She asked him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6029 - 2015-01-15
. He replied that he did not. At that time, she noticed that his eyes were bloodshot. She asked him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6029 - 2015-01-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the child did not occur while the mother was married.” Identical stipulations, judgments and support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162306 - 2017-09-21
of the child did not occur while the mother was married.” Identical stipulations, judgments and support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162306 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court did not find credible Peacock’s claim that Attorney Pangburn made such a statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529906 - 2022-06-08
. The circuit court did not find credible Peacock’s claim that Attorney Pangburn made such a statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529906 - 2022-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2003–04).[1] Baumbach claims that: (1) he did not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waive his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30672 - 2005-03-31
) (2003–04).[1] Baumbach claims that: (1) he did not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waive his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30672 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dante R. Voss
that the motion and affidavit did not show grounds upon which the court could modify Voss’s sentence. ANALYSIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18387 - 2008-01-07
that the motion and affidavit did not show grounds upon which the court could modify Voss’s sentence. ANALYSIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18387 - 2008-01-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
proposal, that an exception to the CUP requirement did not apply, and that the proposal did not fall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812423 - 2024-06-11
proposal, that an exception to the CUP requirement did not apply, and that the proposal did not fall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812423 - 2024-06-11
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
that the defendants did not receive ineffective assistance because they have failed to show prejudice as required
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17518 - 2005-03-31
that the defendants did not receive ineffective assistance because they have failed to show prejudice as required
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17518 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald L. Ragan
that the retrial did not violate Ragan's protection against double jeopardy. Second, Ragan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10347 - 2005-03-31
that the retrial did not violate Ragan's protection against double jeopardy. Second, Ragan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10347 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on collateral review that he did not raise in a prior postconviction proceeding or appeal, his motion brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88545 - 2012-10-23
on collateral review that he did not raise in a prior postconviction proceeding or appeal, his motion brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88545 - 2012-10-23
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
that the defendants did not receive ineffective assistance because they have failed to show prejudice as required
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17520 - 2005-03-31
that the defendants did not receive ineffective assistance because they have failed to show prejudice as required
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17520 - 2005-03-31