Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3951 - 3960 of 66972 for had.
Search results 3951 - 3960 of 66972 for had.
Central Supply, Inc. v. Roosevelt Capital, LLC - 2009AP002299
supports the trial court’s finding that the parties had reached an enforceable agreement and that Roosevelt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52836 - 2010-08-03
supports the trial court’s finding that the parties had reached an enforceable agreement and that Roosevelt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52836 - 2010-08-03
[PDF]
Central Supply, Inc. v. Roosevelt Capital, LLC - 2009AP002299
conclude that the evidence supports the trial court’s finding that the parties had reached an enforceable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52836 - 2014-09-15
conclude that the evidence supports the trial court’s finding that the parties had reached an enforceable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52836 - 2014-09-15
State v. Steven E. Benash - 1995AP002086
the police officer had probable cause to believe that Benash was operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9448 - 2005-03-31
the police officer had probable cause to believe that Benash was operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9448 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven E. Benash - 1995AP002086
the police officer had probable cause to believe that Benash was operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9448 - 2017-09-19
the police officer had probable cause to believe that Benash was operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9448 - 2017-09-19
State v. Allen D. Mechtel - 1994AP002952
the supplier had been observed at Mechtel's residence. We affirm.[1] Mechtel argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8252 - 2005-03-31
the supplier had been observed at Mechtel's residence. We affirm.[1] Mechtel argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8252 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jane A. Sliwinski - 1999AP001943
. ¶1 CANE, C.J.[1] Jane Sliwinski appeals from an order concluding that she had improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15781 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 CANE, C.J.[1] Jane Sliwinski appeals from an order concluding that she had improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15781 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jane A. Sliwinski - 1999AP001943
CANE, C.J.1 Jane Sliwinski appeals from an order concluding that she had improperly refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15781 - 2017-09-21
CANE, C.J.1 Jane Sliwinski appeals from an order concluding that she had improperly refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15781 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Shaun T. Nichols - 2004AP002154
, an acquaintance of April D., to testify about whether April D. had a reputation for truthfulness. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19598 - 2017-09-21
, an acquaintance of April D., to testify about whether April D. had a reputation for truthfulness. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19598 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mylea Wirkus - 2005AP002652
to a prior arrest for OWI, complaining that the officer in that case had made her wait for approximately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21671 - 2006-03-07
to a prior arrest for OWI, complaining that the officer in that case had made her wait for approximately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21671 - 2006-03-07
[PDF]
State v. Mylea Wirkus - 2005AP002652
to a prior arrest for OWI, complaining that the officer in that case had made her wait for approximately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21671 - 2017-09-21
to a prior arrest for OWI, complaining that the officer in that case had made her wait for approximately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21671 - 2017-09-21