Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3951 - 3960 of 68463 for did.
Search results 3951 - 3960 of 68463 for did.
[PDF]
Disposition table for July & August 2009
08/17/2009 2007AP0427-CR State v. Day Ziegler, J., did not participate. 07/15/2009 2007AP1328
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43657 - 2014-09-15
08/17/2009 2007AP0427-CR State v. Day Ziegler, J., did not participate. 07/15/2009 2007AP1328
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43657 - 2014-09-15
Edward M. Moran v. Property Management Concepts
We conclude the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in hearing the three cases together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7405 - 2005-03-31
We conclude the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in hearing the three cases together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7405 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the warrant requirement did not apply here because Bertelsen’s vehicle was not readily mobile. ¶2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757077 - 2024-01-30
to the warrant requirement did not apply here because Bertelsen’s vehicle was not readily mobile. ¶2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757077 - 2024-01-30
Edward M. Moran v. Lakeview Investments
We conclude the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in hearing the three cases together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7404 - 2005-03-31
We conclude the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in hearing the three cases together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7404 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, C.J.[1] Bruce A. Findley did not make a timely property division payment of $162,500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34980 - 2008-12-22
, C.J.[1] Bruce A. Findley did not make a timely property division payment of $162,500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34980 - 2008-12-22
State v. Ronnie P.
of parental rights — Ronnie did not appear because he was incarcerated. January 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15143 - 2005-03-31
of parental rights — Ronnie did not appear because he was incarcerated. January 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15143 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Ahne Herlitzka. Zernia argues that the evidence did not support the injunction. For the reasons set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198698 - 2017-10-26
Ahne Herlitzka. Zernia argues that the evidence did not support the injunction. For the reasons set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198698 - 2017-10-26
Nova Services, Inc. v. Village of Saukville
. The Village of Saukville contends, however, that its attorney did not act as a prosecutor, but “merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11193 - 2005-03-31
. The Village of Saukville contends, however, that its attorney did not act as a prosecutor, but “merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11193 - 2005-03-31
Evelyn C. R. v. Tykila S.
defender’s office. Apparently she did so, for at a pretrial conference on February 17, 2000, she appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2748 - 2005-03-31
defender’s office. Apparently she did so, for at a pretrial conference on February 17, 2000, she appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2748 - 2005-03-31
Elizabeth Tooke v. Robert Tooke
. Unfortunately, Robert's financial statement did not mention that in 1988, the City of Onalaska had levied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8955 - 2005-03-31
. Unfortunately, Robert's financial statement did not mention that in 1988, the City of Onalaska had levied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8955 - 2005-03-31