Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3861 - 3870 of 15398 for probate.
Search results 3861 - 3870 of 15398 for probate.
[PDF]
State v. Brook Grzelak
.” The Court in Carchman held that art. III does not apply to detainers based on probation violations. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12501 - 2017-09-21
.” The Court in Carchman held that art. III does not apply to detainers based on probation violations. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12501 - 2017-09-21
State v. Louis Elizondo, Jr.
consecutive three-month county jail sentences, and placing him on probation for two years on the condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10169 - 2005-03-31
consecutive three-month county jail sentences, and placing him on probation for two years on the condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10169 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. DeVon'tre L. Cottingham
by disclosing to the jury that he was on probation at the time of the crime. We conclude that Cottingham
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5189 - 2017-09-19
by disclosing to the jury that he was on probation at the time of the crime. We conclude that Cottingham
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5189 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, William Wenkman, into probate.[1] Anne and Gregory had challenged the will based on allegations that one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101602 - 2013-09-04
, William Wenkman, into probate.[1] Anne and Gregory had challenged the will based on allegations that one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101602 - 2013-09-04
State v. Brook Grzelak
that art. III does not apply to detainers based on probation violations. Id. Carchman is not plainly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12501 - 2005-03-31
that art. III does not apply to detainers based on probation violations. Id. Carchman is not plainly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12501 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
”; (2) at the time of sentencing, Sulla had served only one prior term of probation and had four prior
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063985 - 2026-01-23
”; (2) at the time of sentencing, Sulla had served only one prior term of probation and had four prior
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063985 - 2026-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS
. “‘Extended supervision is akin to probation.’ Therefore, ‘case law relating to the propriety of conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48904 - 2010-04-12
. “‘Extended supervision is akin to probation.’ Therefore, ‘case law relating to the propriety of conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48904 - 2010-04-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
”; (2) at the time of sentencing, Sulla had served only one prior term of probation and had four prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063985 - 2026-01-23
”; (2) at the time of sentencing, Sulla had served only one prior term of probation and had four prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063985 - 2026-01-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court followed the defense recommendation and placed Reese on concurrent periods of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144414 - 2017-09-21
. The circuit court followed the defense recommendation and placed Reese on concurrent periods of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144414 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
of her probation imposed by the Supreme Court of Arizona, and direct her to pay the "restitution
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77947 - 2012-02-08
of her probation imposed by the Supreme Court of Arizona, and direct her to pay the "restitution
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77947 - 2012-02-08