Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3831 - 3840 of 16013 for search wicourts.gov.
Search results 3831 - 3840 of 16013 for search wicourts.gov.
State v. Kingston D. Brown - 2009AP000324
. The issue is whether Brown voluntarily consented to the search of his home. We conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47247 - 2010-02-22
. The issue is whether Brown voluntarily consented to the search of his home. We conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47247 - 2010-02-22
[PDF]
State v. Kingston D. Brown - 2009AP000324
. The issue is whether Brown voluntarily consented to the search of his home. We conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47247 - 2014-09-15
. The issue is whether Brown voluntarily consented to the search of his home. We conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47247 - 2014-09-15
State v. Wendell L. Gaines - 1994AP001225
lawfully searched Gaines's notebook; (2) whether the police lawfully seized his car; (3) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7868 - 2005-03-31
lawfully searched Gaines's notebook; (2) whether the police lawfully seized his car; (3) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7868 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nathan T. Moore - 2004AP000952
to conduct a protective search of his person during a temporary stop pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 968.24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7447 - 2005-03-31
to conduct a protective search of his person during a temporary stop pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 968.24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7447 - 2005-03-31
State v. Delano J. O'Brien - 1996AP003028
of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search of his premises, from judgments of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11595 - 2005-03-31
of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search of his premises, from judgments of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11595 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Keith Schroeder - 1999AP001292
. Second, there was no Fourth Amendment violation in the crime lab’s search of Schroeder’s computer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15529 - 2017-09-21
. Second, there was no Fourth Amendment violation in the crime lab’s search of Schroeder’s computer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15529 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Keith Schroeder - 1999AP002264
. Second, there was no Fourth Amendment violation in the crime lab’s search of Schroeder’s computer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15926 - 2017-09-21
. Second, there was no Fourth Amendment violation in the crime lab’s search of Schroeder’s computer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15926 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jimmy Reed - 1999AP002108
of the apartment. The officers had not obtained a search warrant, but Pierce obtained Jackson’s consent to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15862 - 2005-03-31
of the apartment. The officers had not obtained a search warrant, but Pierce obtained Jackson’s consent to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15862 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jimmy Reed - 1999AP002108
of the apartment. The officers had not obtained a search warrant, but Pierce obtained Jackson’s consent to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15862 - 2017-09-21
of the apartment. The officers had not obtained a search warrant, but Pierce obtained Jackson’s consent to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15862 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth E. Ridener - 2008AP001640
pursuant to three search warrants. The first 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36547 - 2014-09-15
pursuant to three search warrants. The first 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36547 - 2014-09-15