Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3771 - 3780 of 16013 for search wicourts.gov.
Search results 3771 - 3780 of 16013 for search wicourts.gov.
[PDF]
State v. Andre A. Bridges - 2013AP000350
suppression motion. He asserts that: he had standing to challenge the search of his friend’s apartment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133593 - 2017-09-21
suppression motion. He asserts that: he had standing to challenge the search of his friend’s apartment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133593 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Rufus R. Bell - 2007AP002023
with Bell and two ensuing searches of his person, the second of which yielded the narcotics at issue. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33393 - 2014-09-15
with Bell and two ensuing searches of his person, the second of which yielded the narcotics at issue. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33393 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
The Third Branch, fall 2003
@wicourts.gov. A. John Voelker Reserve Judge Patrick L. Snyder T H E T H IR D Fall 2003 3 Dollars
/news/thirdbranch/docs/fall03.pdf - 2009-12-02
@wicourts.gov. A. John Voelker Reserve Judge Patrick L. Snyder T H E T H IR D Fall 2003 3 Dollars
/news/thirdbranch/docs/fall03.pdf - 2009-12-02
State v. Antoine Lamont Massey - 2012AP001124
challenges the search that led to the discovery of the cocaine, arguing that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93594 - 2013-03-04
challenges the search that led to the discovery of the cocaine, arguing that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93594 - 2013-03-04
[PDF]
State v. Antoine Lamont Massey - 2012AP001124
challenges the No. 2012AP1124-CR 2 search that led to the discovery of the cocaine, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93594 - 2014-09-15
challenges the No. 2012AP1124-CR 2 search that led to the discovery of the cocaine, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93594 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 10
@wicourts.gov), identifying the proceeding (whether existing or anticipated) for which the party is requesting
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=626527 - 2023-02-21
@wicourts.gov), identifying the proceeding (whether existing or anticipated) for which the party is requesting
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=626527 - 2023-02-21
[PDF]
19-02C & 20-07C In re Interim Court Rule Governing Electronic Filing in the Supreme Court.
@wicourts.gov), identifying the proceeding (whether existing or anticipated) for which the party is requesting
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=626527 - 2023-02-21
@wicourts.gov), identifying the proceeding (whether existing or anticipated) for which the party is requesting
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=626527 - 2023-02-21
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
Telephone: (608) 266-1880 Email: clerk@wicourts.gov Web Site: www.wicourts.gov Wisconsin Supreme
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837992 - 2024-08-12
Telephone: (608) 266-1880 Email: clerk@wicourts.gov Web Site: www.wicourts.gov Wisconsin Supreme
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837992 - 2024-08-12
[PDF]
State v. Lamardus D. Ford - 1996AP002826
evidence because the search which produced the marijuana for which he No. 96-2826-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11512 - 2017-09-19
evidence because the search which produced the marijuana for which he No. 96-2826-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11512 - 2017-09-19
State v. Lamardus D. Ford - 1996AP002826
. He claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11512 - 2005-03-31
. He claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11512 - 2005-03-31