Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3741 - 3750 of 63358 for b's.
Search results 3741 - 3750 of 63358 for b's.
State v. Andrew M. Obriecht - 2013AP001345
that the plain language of Wis. Stat. § 302.11(7)(am) and (b) required that Obriecht's sentence credit be applied
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144056 - 2015-07-06
that the plain language of Wis. Stat. § 302.11(7)(am) and (b) required that Obriecht's sentence credit be applied
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144056 - 2015-07-06
[PDF]
Glen H. Rocker v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company - 2004AP000356
handler" found in Wis. Stat. § 632.32(2)(b); (2) Does the holding in Heritage Mutual Insurance Co. v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24675 - 2017-09-21
handler" found in Wis. Stat. § 632.32(2)(b); (2) Does the holding in Heritage Mutual Insurance Co. v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24675 - 2017-09-21
Glen H. Rocker v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company - 2004AP000356
car wash fall within the definition of a "motor vehicle handler" found in Wis. Stat. § 632.32(2)(b
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24675 - 2006-03-29
car wash fall within the definition of a "motor vehicle handler" found in Wis. Stat. § 632.32(2)(b
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24675 - 2006-03-29
[PDF]
Darboy Joint Sanitary District No. 1 v. City of Kaukauna - 2012AP002639
not approve of the proposed annexation pursuant to § 66.0217(14)(b)1. Because we agree with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100356 - 2017-09-21
not approve of the proposed annexation pursuant to § 66.0217(14)(b)1. Because we agree with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100356 - 2017-09-21
Darboy Joint Sanitary District No. 1 v. City of Kaukauna - 2012AP002639
) in that the Town Board did not approve of the proposed annexation pursuant to § 66.0217(14)(b)1. Because we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100356 - 2013-09-24
) in that the Town Board did not approve of the proposed annexation pursuant to § 66.0217(14)(b)1. Because we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100356 - 2013-09-24
[PDF]
Philip Myers v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources - 2016AP001517
improper because: (1) the pier was exempt from permit requirements, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 30.12(1k)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195413 - 2017-09-21
improper because: (1) the pier was exempt from permit requirements, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 30.12(1k)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195413 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
SK Management, LLC v. Donald L. King - 2021AP000490
, V. DONALD L. KING, BRIAN L. SCHWEINERT, D/B/A MR. PHIXITALL, LABOR AND INDUSTRY REVIEW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558087 - 2022-08-23
, V. DONALD L. KING, BRIAN L. SCHWEINERT, D/B/A MR. PHIXITALL, LABOR AND INDUSTRY REVIEW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558087 - 2022-08-23
Kenneth P. Mader v. Community Credit Plan, Inc. - 1997AP003626
have been dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See § 421.401(2)(b). Because the court lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13386 - 2005-03-31
have been dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See § 421.401(2)(b). Because the court lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13386 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Marcia K. Johnson v. Community Credit Plan, Inc. - 1998AP000092
: (a) Where the customer resides or is personally served; (b) Where collateral securing a consumer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13513 - 2017-09-21
: (a) Where the customer resides or is personally served; (b) Where collateral securing a consumer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13513 - 2017-09-21
Marcia K. Johnson v. Community Credit Plan, Inc. - 1998AP000092
have been dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See § 421.401(2)(b). Because the court lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13513 - 2005-03-31
have been dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See § 421.401(2)(b). Because the court lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13513 - 2005-03-31