Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3711 - 3720 of 19091 for citi.

City of Madison v. Ray A. Peterson
DISTRICT IV City of Madison, Plaintiff-Respondent, v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2255 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Thomas M. Giebel v. Curt W. Richards
of garbage on the Giebels’ property. Neighbors complained to the City of Cudahy and, as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12763 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Kazim Investment, Inc.
At the confirmation hearing, Assistant City Attorney David Halbrooks, appearing on behalf of the City to offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6160 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
applies is one of law, which we review de novo.2 DeFever v. City of Waukesha, 2007 WI App 266, ¶6
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257448 - 2020-04-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
prescribes the manner in which it is to be performed.” DeFever v. City of Waukesha, 2007 WI App 266, ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=310565 - 2020-12-03

Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Polk County Board of Adjustment
review, our standard of review of the circuit court decision is de novo. State ex rel. Hippler v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14174 - 2005-03-31

State v. Rodney G. Zivcic
the Milwaukee County deputy sheriff illegally arrested him because the arrest occurred in the City of Greenfield
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13816 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Reuben Granado v. Sentry Insurance
interpretation is to ascertain and give effect to the legislature’s intent. Lake City Corp. v. City of Mequon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14941 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in the City of Milwaukee. The security camera of a nearby homeowner captured the robbery on tape. A police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106316 - 2017-09-21

Scott Wright v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Labor & Industry Review Commission, Monterey Mills, Inc., City Cab
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10662 - 2005-03-31