Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3541 - 3550 of 63358 for b's.

James Antisdel v. City of Oak Creek Police and Fire Commission - 1997AP003818
, an aggrieved person or the chief under par. (b), unless the board determines whether there is just cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13464 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] James Antisdel v. City of Oak Creek Police and Fire Commission - 1997AP003818
or the chief under par. (b), unless the board determines whether there is just cause, as described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13464 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew R. Schwitzer - 2015AP000675
)(a), a Class B misdemeanor; Possession of THC, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 961.41(3g)(e), an unclassified
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191126 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michele A. Tjader - 2017AP000411
SCR 20:1.15(b)(4m)b 3 and SCR 20:1.16(d), 4 stemming from her representation of three clients
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222212 - 2018-10-16

Gary Schonscheck v. Paccar, Inc. - 2002AP001413
-Respondent, v. Paccar, Inc., d/b/a Kenworth Truck Company
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5289 - 2005-03-31

State v. Paul R. Maxey - 2002AP001171
provisions of Wis. Stat. § 939.62(1)(b).[2] Based principally on the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s recent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5215 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeremy R. Engebretson - 2001AP003326
)(a) and (1)(b). Because subsec. (1)(a) and (1)(b) present distinct inquiries, we address each subsection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4687 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jeremy R. Engebretson - 2001AP003326
and the potential punishment if convicted. (b) Make such inquiry as satisfies it that the defendant in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4687 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jeremy R. Engebretson - 2001AP003327
and the potential punishment if convicted. (b) Make such inquiry as satisfies it that the defendant in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4688 - 2017-09-19

State v. Jeremy R. Engebretson - 2001AP003327
)(a) and (1)(b). Because subsec. (1)(a) and (1)(b) present distinct inquiries, we address each subsection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4688 - 2005-03-31