Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3511 - 3520 of 66215 for did.

[PDF] State v. Marcus Lynn Taylor - 2018AP000899
denied the claim and the evidence did not support charging him, he was removed from the home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243422 - 2019-07-10

[PDF] State v. Synika Antonio Kirk - 2019AP000175
, was played at the hearing on Kirk’s motion to suppress evidence. The parties did not move this recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289601 - 2020-09-22

[PDF] State v. Dustin M. Yanda - 2018AP000412
statutory ineligibility for the programs did not “frustrate the purpose of the sentence.” ¶2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242358 - 2019-06-18

[PDF] State v. Jervon Strotter - 2018AP000946
in fines. The circuit court did not specifically review party to a crime liability with Strotter. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226345 - 2018-11-01

[PDF] State v. Donya T. Lee - 2020AP000753
, showed her bullets with a “reddish” tip, and threatened to shoot her if she did it again. ¶3 After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342677 - 2021-03-09

[PDF] State v. Rodney G. Zivcic - 1998AP001381
did not raise any objection to the six-person jury, because the deputy had authority, pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14019 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Walter P. VanDeMortel - 1998AP001268
cause for his arrest did not exist; (2) even if the arrest were valid, he was no longer in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13969 - 2014-09-15

State v. Dimitrius Anagnos - 2010AP001812
was lawful as the deputy did not have reasonable suspicion to stop Anagnos. ¶2 The State appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68305 - 2013-04-23

[PDF] State v. Dimitrius Anagnos - 2010AP001812
as the deputy did not have reasonable suspicion to stop Anagnos. ¶2 The State appeals and raises two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68305 - 2014-09-15

W. George Bowring v. Wisconsin Division of Highways & Transportation - 1996AP000246
answer on July 25, 1995. The trial did not take place on August 3. Instead, on that date the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10308 - 2005-03-31