Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3501 - 3510 of 63358 for b's.

[PDF] Oneida County v. Michael B. - 2006AP002848
OF APPEALS DISTRICT III IN THE MATTER OF THE MENTAL COMMITMENT OF MICHAEL B.: ONEIDA COUNTY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28767 - 2014-09-15

Douglas A. v. Winnebago County - 1998AP002810
of are discretionary acts, that is, acts involving the exercise of discretion and judgment. See Kara B. v. Dane County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14564 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Douglas A. v. Winnebago County - 1998AP002810
of discretion and judgment. See Kara B. v. Dane County, 198 Wis.2d 24, 54, 542 N.W.2d 777, 790 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14564 - 2017-09-21

City of Wauwatosa v. William J. Morgan - 1998AP000176
jurisdictional defects under § 800.01(2)(b), Stats.: that the citations did not contain a statement of personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13540 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Wauwatosa v. William J. Morgan - 1998AP000176
challenged both alleging two jurisdictional defects under § 800.01(2)(b), STATS.: that the citations did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13540 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Andrae T. D'Acquisto - 1999AP002712
of hunting deer after hours contrary to WIS. ADMIN. CODE § NR 10.06(2)(b).2 He contends that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16118 - 2017-09-21

State v. Andrae T. D'Acquisto - 1999AP002712
him guilty of hunting deer after hours contrary to Wis. Admin. Code § NR 10.06(2)(b).[2] He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16118 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Dale Gould, Jr. - 2000AP000768
-style. (b) If the defendant is accused of a crime under s. 940.225, 948.02, 948.025, 948.05, 948.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2406 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Randall McConochie - 2000AP000672
for purposes of sentence enhancement under WIS. STAT. § 346.65(2)(b). He contends that his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2371 - 2017-09-19

State v. Randall McConochie - 2000AP000672
(2)(b). He contends that his motion to collaterally attack the prior civil forfeiture determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2371 - 2005-03-31