Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3491 - 3500 of 51054 for address.
Search results 3491 - 3500 of 51054 for address.
Nicholas A. Livingston v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company - 2002AP001733
to immunity also exists when a public agency or official negligently addresses or responds to a “compelling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5425 - 2005-03-31
to immunity also exists when a public agency or official negligently addresses or responds to a “compelling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5425 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Whitewater v. Darren R. Gill - 1999AP003064
because of a procedural defect. We do not address the merits of Gill’s argument, however, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16230 - 2017-09-21
because of a procedural defect. We do not address the merits of Gill’s argument, however, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16230 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christina Ann Clark - 2020AP001879
addresses whether Clark’s no-contest pleas were knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=493100 - 2022-03-10
addresses whether Clark’s no-contest pleas were knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=493100 - 2022-03-10
[PDF]
State v. Anthony C. Pepalinski - 2020AP000235
addresses whether Pepalinski’s guilty pleas were knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=385482 - 2021-07-08
addresses whether Pepalinski’s guilty pleas were knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=385482 - 2021-07-08
[PDF]
State v. Joel Lee, Jr. - 2014AP001102
, 2012, the State filed a complaint against Lee for failing to update information (a new address
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136720 - 2017-09-21
, 2012, the State filed a complaint against Lee for failing to update information (a new address
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136720 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy Denard Tobias - 2020AP000825
credit for each of the concurrent sentences. The no-merit report addresses four primary issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456614 - 2021-11-30
credit for each of the concurrent sentences. The no-merit report addresses four primary issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456614 - 2021-11-30
[PDF]
State v. Trevor J. Teela - 2019AP001104
years’ extended supervision on the THC charge, consecutively. The no-merit report addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460686 - 2021-12-07
years’ extended supervision on the THC charge, consecutively. The no-merit report addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460686 - 2021-12-07
[PDF]
State v. Robert Michael Christophel - 2015AP000593
the supplemental report addressing the Radaj and Loomis issues as requested. As relevant to the present order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204716 - 2017-12-04
the supplemental report addressing the Radaj and Loomis issues as requested. As relevant to the present order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204716 - 2017-12-04
[PDF]
State v. Samuel John Williams - 2017AP001110
. STAT. RULE 809.21. Therefore, we affirm. The no-merit report first addresses whether there would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213769 - 2018-05-31
. STAT. RULE 809.21. Therefore, we affirm. The no-merit report first addresses whether there would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213769 - 2018-05-31
[PDF]
State v. Jelani N. Clements - 2017AP002181
affirm. The no-merit report first addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213776 - 2018-05-31
affirm. The no-merit report first addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213776 - 2018-05-31