Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3411 - 3420 of 38318 for indications.

State v. Taronzo L. Payne - 2012AP001740
.2d 599 (Ct. App. 1991). There is no indication of any such defect here. Payne entered his plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104673 - 2013-11-19

State v. Michael J. Allen - 2013AP000957
. App. 1991). There is no indication of any such defect here. Allen entered a plea pursuant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110282 - 2014-04-09

[PDF] James J. Doubleday v. Town of Hartford - 2022AP000457
with the parking associated with the Property.” The minutes themselves indicate that Lofy “stated that he has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617296 - 2023-02-01

[PDF] State v. Frederick L. Jones - 2015AP000759
. 1991). There is no indication of any such defect here. Jones entered his plea pursuant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175492 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ontario A. Davis - 2006AP002410
at sentencing indicate that the trial court was unaware of the existence of Wis. Stat. § 973.03(2), which reads
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27935 - 2007-01-29

State v. Phillip M. Ross - 2004AP001981
risk scores on two actuarial instruments, which indicated he was not a high risk to reoffend. Lytton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18694 - 2005-06-27

[PDF] State v. Debra A. Sledge - 1998AP001349
tendered a no contest plea because of possible “civil ramifications.” The trial court indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14004 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Amy Willoughby - 1997AP001201
language of the statute indicates the statute is more narrow in scope. The statute specifically limits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12407 - 2017-09-21

State v. Joseph C. Clark - 1997AP003584
indicates that to mutilate could mean to “permanently destroy a limb or essential part,” or “alter radically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13365 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Oneida County Department of Human Services v. Paris M.P. - 2008AP003214
on the [grounds] issues.” The court concluded this testimony indicated Paris and Bennett had “discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36405 - 2014-09-15