Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3401 - 3410 of 68458 for did.
Search results 3401 - 3410 of 68458 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
and the verdict. The jury convicted Dupree of conspiracy to deliver cocaine. Dupree did not appeal his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86892 - 2012-09-10
and the verdict. The jury convicted Dupree of conspiracy to deliver cocaine. Dupree did not appeal his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86892 - 2012-09-10
Jerry Chandler v. Larry Gapinski
would be restored to show quality. Gapinski acknowledged that L & L Custom did not restore the 1955
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12699 - 2005-03-31
would be restored to show quality. Gapinski acknowledged that L & L Custom did not restore the 1955
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12699 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rodney C. Burkins
to consent because he did not inform him that he could lose his commercial operating license if he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9406 - 2017-09-19
to consent because he did not inform him that he could lose his commercial operating license if he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9406 - 2017-09-19
State v. Maurice D. Harris
was not needed. As for Harris’s claim that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5766 - 2005-03-31
was not needed. As for Harris’s claim that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5766 - 2005-03-31
State v. Maurice D. Harris
was not needed. As for Harris’s claim that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5764 - 2005-03-31
was not needed. As for Harris’s claim that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5764 - 2005-03-31
State v. Maurice D. Harris
was not needed. As for Harris’s claim that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5765 - 2005-03-31
was not needed. As for Harris’s claim that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5765 - 2005-03-31
State v. Henry W. Aufderhaar
resolution prior to finality. As to the three issues we do consider, we hold that the court did not lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6985 - 2005-03-31
resolution prior to finality. As to the three issues we do consider, we hold that the court did not lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6985 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Henry W. Aufderhaar
to finality. As to the three issues we do consider, we hold that the court did not lack personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6985 - 2017-09-20
to finality. As to the three issues we do consider, we hold that the court did not lack personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6985 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Snider
statements of children via other hearsay exceptions, and that the trial court did not erroneously exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5374 - 2017-09-19
statements of children via other hearsay exceptions, and that the trial court did not erroneously exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5374 - 2017-09-19
2008 WI APP 5
with confident certainty that the visible device did not unfairly prejudice Champlain, we hold that the prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31067 - 2008-01-29
with confident certainty that the visible device did not unfairly prejudice Champlain, we hold that the prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31067 - 2008-01-29