Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3291 - 3300 of 66208 for did.

[PDF] State v. Michael E. Wilson - 1996AP002915
of Natural Resources (DNR) warden who stopped him did not have authority to conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11549 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] City of Columbus v. Donald L. Johnson - 2004AP000087
the officer had the requisite reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop. We conclude the officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7225 - 2017-09-20

City of Columbus v. Donald L. Johnson - 2004AP000087
. We conclude the officer did, and we therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7225 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of La Crosse v. Neil Collins - 1997AP002994
and 66.015, STATS. The City contends that the petition did not meet the statutory requirement of § 66.014
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13137 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Curran v. Jeannine Pemberton - 1997AP003073
reasonable and necessary. Pemberton testified that they did not pay Curran because they were billed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13170 - 2017-09-21

Deshawn Parker v. Jonas Walker - 1995AP002958
conclusion that DeShawn did not use a red Bic lighter to start a fire. The Parkers argue that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9881 - 2005-03-31

Curran v. Jeannine Pemberton - 1997AP003073
that they did not pay Curran because they were billed for work that was not done. Pemberton and Paulman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13170 - 2005-03-31

George A. Mudrovich v. Trans-America, LLC - 2000AP001235
Mudrovich did not raise the issue of unjust enrichment at trial, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2577 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. L. C. Hogan - 2014AP001670
’ as to its meaning, then the ‘suspect did not sufficiently invoke the right to remain silent.’” Id., ¶51
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141545 - 2017-09-21

State v. L. C. Hogan - 2014AP001670
is susceptible to ‘reasonable competing inferences’ as to its meaning, then the ‘suspect did not sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141545 - 2015-05-11