Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32661 - 32670 of 62262 for child support.
Search results 32661 - 32670 of 62262 for child support.
State v. Brady B.
discretion was not exercised in a reasonable manner. In support of that prong, there should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14191 - 2005-03-31
discretion was not exercised in a reasonable manner. In support of that prong, there should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14191 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael M. Meininger
, and that he was weaving in his lane. If believed, that testimony was sufficient to support the officer's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10932 - 2017-09-20
, and that he was weaving in his lane. If believed, that testimony was sufficient to support the officer's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10932 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
the requisite showing. He relies solely on assertions—made without factual support—that the proceedings against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95670 - 2013-04-22
the requisite showing. He relies solely on assertions—made without factual support—that the proceedings against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95670 - 2013-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
disputed finding of fact” so long as it is supported by substantial evidence in the record. § 227.57(6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062702 - 2026-01-15
disputed finding of fact” so long as it is supported by substantial evidence in the record. § 227.57(6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062702 - 2026-01-15
Mike Maes Construction, Inc. v. Francis Grady
evidence supports the commission’s finding that Maes was an employer as defined in Wis. Stat. § 102.04(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16031 - 2005-03-31
evidence supports the commission’s finding that Maes was an employer as defined in Wis. Stat. § 102.04(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16031 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that there is not one scintilla of evidence in the appellate records to support Dyson’s assertion that the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49296 - 2010-04-26
that there is not one scintilla of evidence in the appellate records to support Dyson’s assertion that the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49296 - 2010-04-26
CA Blank Order
. Hays acknowledged the prior offenses that support the repeater allegations, and those offenses were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132564 - 2015-01-05
. Hays acknowledged the prior offenses that support the repeater allegations, and those offenses were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132564 - 2015-01-05
State v. Robert R. Shaffer
). We have also independently reviewed the record to determine whether sufficient evidence supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11137 - 2005-03-31
). We have also independently reviewed the record to determine whether sufficient evidence supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11137 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
several DOC documents to support her assertion that intensive, daily monitoring was available, the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135270 - 2015-02-16
several DOC documents to support her assertion that intensive, daily monitoring was available, the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135270 - 2015-02-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was not reasonable suspicion to support the traffic stop that led to his arrest and conviction. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94497 - 2014-09-15
that there was not reasonable suspicion to support the traffic stop that led to his arrest and conviction. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94497 - 2014-09-15