Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3261 - 3270 of 66208 for did.
Search results 3261 - 3270 of 66208 for did.
Anthony R.V. v. Gerald P.C. - 1998AP002919
. Jeffrey did receive a birthday card from Gerald when he was four years old and Gerald may have tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14617 - 2005-03-31
. Jeffrey did receive a birthday card from Gerald when he was four years old and Gerald may have tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14617 - 2005-03-31
Luai M. Hinnawi v. - 1995AP001446
him for information, and did not respond to inquiries from the Board in respect to the client's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17018 - 2005-03-31
him for information, and did not respond to inquiries from the Board in respect to the client's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17018 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Norris Edward Pegues - 2007AP001292
to remove a juror with a Hispanic surname. Pegues did not raise this objection at trial and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39277 - 2014-09-15
to remove a juror with a Hispanic surname. Pegues did not raise this objection at trial and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39277 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael Adam Watts - 2002AP002850
: first, because he did not believe the evidence supported the instruction; and second, because it clashed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5813 - 2005-03-31
: first, because he did not believe the evidence supported the instruction; and second, because it clashed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5813 - 2005-03-31
State v. William H. Roberts - 2001AP001636
the plea on the grounds that he never admitted his repeater status at the time of the plea nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4088 - 2005-03-31
the plea on the grounds that he never admitted his repeater status at the time of the plea nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4088 - 2005-03-31
State v. William H. Roberts - 2001AP001637
the plea on the grounds that he never admitted his repeater status at the time of the plea nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4089 - 2005-03-31
the plea on the grounds that he never admitted his repeater status at the time of the plea nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4089 - 2005-03-31
State v. William H. Roberts - 2001AP001638
the plea on the grounds that he never admitted his repeater status at the time of the plea nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4090 - 2005-03-31
the plea on the grounds that he never admitted his repeater status at the time of the plea nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4090 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles M. Saxon - 2011AP001296
her clothing, then digitally penetrated her. Saxon said he did not recall the incident because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79653 - 2014-09-15
her clothing, then digitally penetrated her. Saxon said he did not recall the incident because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79653 - 2014-09-15
Fidelis Omegbu v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. - 2010AP001831
judgment because it did not properly respond to Omegbu’s motion for judgment on the pleadings; (3) Omegbu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61611 - 2011-03-23
judgment because it did not properly respond to Omegbu’s motion for judgment on the pleadings; (3) Omegbu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61611 - 2011-03-23
[PDF]
Fidelis Omegbu v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. - 2010AP001831
Family was not entitled to summary judgment because it did not properly respond to Omegbu’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61611 - 2014-09-15
Family was not entitled to summary judgment because it did not properly respond to Omegbu’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61611 - 2014-09-15