Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3251 - 3260 of 68458 for did.

[PDF] State v. Thomas E. Richmond
in handling questions posed by the jury during its deliberations. Because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11331 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Pickens’ sentence in sentencing Booker because it was irrelevant, but even if the court did, Pickens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668713 - 2023-06-20

[PDF] Outagamie County Department of Human Services v. Ismael P.
). Ismael contends that the trial court did not find good cause to extend the time limits pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3575 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Michael E. Wilson
of Natural Resources (DNR) warden who stopped him did not have authority to conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11549 - 2017-09-19

Joyce Judith Syphard v. Ronald James Syphard
on a probation hold. He did not appear at the trial, request a continuance or otherwise communicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5243 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
).1 We affirm as the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in determining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264671 - 2020-06-17

State v. Kenneth Golden
that it did, and thus we affirm. BACKGROUND Golden was charged with theft from the person as a repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12905 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Socorro Angelica Alfaro v. Jerry Frick
did not prove by the greater weight of the evidence that the parties mutually agreed to terminate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7344 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] George A. Mudrovich v. Trans-America, LLC
that Mudrovich withdrew his settlement offer is not clearly erroneous and because Mudrovich did not raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2577 - 2017-09-19

George A. Mudrovich v. Trans-America, LLC
Mudrovich did not raise the issue of unjust enrichment at trial, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2577 - 2005-03-31