Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 321 - 330 of 18697 for citi.

[PDF] Town of Lincoln v. City of Whitehall - 2017AP000684
-APPELLANT, V. CITY OF WHITEHALL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Opinion Filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211337 - 2018-08-29

[PDF] City of Prescott v. Gary Holmgren - 2005AP002673
Complete Title of Case: †Petition for Review Filed CITY OF PRESCOTT, PLAINTIFF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25960 - 2017-09-21

City of Prescott v. Gary Holmgren - 2005AP002673
Title of Case: †Petition for Review Filed City of Prescott, Plaintiff-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25960 - 2006-08-29

Walgreen Co. v. City of Oshkosh - 2013AP002818
Walgreen Co., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. City of Oshkosh, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131662 - 2014-12-16

[PDF] Walgreen Co. v. City of Oshkosh - 2013AP002818
., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. CITY OF OSHKOSH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131662 - 2017-09-21

State v. Richard D. Hubatch - 1997AP002627
be overturned because the action was prosecuted by the city attorney instead of by the district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12995 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Richard D. Hubatch - 1997AP002627
should be overturned because the action was prosecuted by the city attorney instead of by the district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12995 - 2017-09-21

Derosso Landfill Company, Inc. v. City of Oak Creek - 1994AP000440
. City of Oak Creek, Defendant-Appellant. FILED MAY 13, 1996
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16901 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Stoughton v. Thomasson Lumber Company - 2002AP002192
Complete Title of Case: †Petition for Review filed. CITY OF STOUGHTON, PLAINTIFF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5569 - 2017-09-19

City of Stoughton v. Thomasson Lumber Company - 2002AP002192
Title of Case: †Petition for Review filed. City of Stoughton, Plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5569 - 2005-03-31