Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3181 - 3190 of 67241 for had.

[PDF] Stephanie D. Irby v. Stanley H. Hunt - 1995AP000497
Irby's complaint. The trial court concluded that Irby's failure to comply with the scheduling order had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8671 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Sally S. - 1995AP001713
-year-old juvenile, had committed burglary, contrary to §§ 943.10(1)(a), 939.50(3)(c) and 48.12(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9245 - 2017-09-19

Holly R. v. Joseph T. - 2000AP001499
defender’s office had said that someone would come to the jail for a conference, but that no-one had done so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2663 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jimmye Richardson - 2011AP002410
as a witness. Richardson argued that there had been a discovery violation. He claimed that if the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89601 - 2012-11-26

[PDF] State v. Levi Alexander Rodebaugh - 2011AP002659
of the presence of the jury, the prosecutor informed the court at 10:34 a.m. that the alleged victim, E.S., had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80353 - 2014-09-15

State v. Levi Alexander Rodebaugh - 2011AP002659
informed the court at 10:34 a.m. that the alleged victim, E.S., had not appeared. ¶3 The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80353 - 2012-04-04

[PDF] State v. Jimmye Richardson - 2011AP002410
as a witness. Richardson argued that there had been a discovery violation. He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89601 - 2014-09-15

State v. Bryan J. Stanley - 2012AP001558
. At the end of the hearing, the court concluded that Stanley had violated the first rule of his conditional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97232 - 2013-05-22

[PDF] State v. Bryan J. Stanley - 2012AP001558
a hearing on the petition on May 9, 2012. At the end of the hearing, the court concluded that Stanley had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97232 - 2014-09-15

Paul Steven Screnock v. Malyn Screnock - 1998AP001080
of these regards. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND Paul and Malyn married in 1975 and had three minor children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13895 - 2005-03-31