Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3181 - 3190 of 68463 for did.
Search results 3181 - 3190 of 68463 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at her. Johnson explained, “They just—they followed Emily is what they did they followed her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96321 - 2014-09-15
at her. Johnson explained, “They just—they followed Emily is what they did they followed her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96321 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence. Kosinski argued that the State did not prove the repeater allegation and that the court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144544 - 2017-09-21
sentence. Kosinski argued that the State did not prove the repeater allegation and that the court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144544 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jimmy Thomas
court stated that even if it did not consider the factors that Thomas believed were improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9767 - 2017-09-19
court stated that even if it did not consider the factors that Thomas believed were improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9767 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
have been raised because: (1) his trial counsel did not hire an No. 2011AP642 4 expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90212 - 2014-09-15
have been raised because: (1) his trial counsel did not hire an No. 2011AP642 4 expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90212 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the effective assistance of trial counsel because counsel did not object to the judge’s indications of bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32746 - 2008-05-20
the effective assistance of trial counsel because counsel did not object to the judge’s indications of bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32746 - 2008-05-20
State v. Wesley S. Leonard
the revocation order and that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14961 - 2005-03-31
the revocation order and that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14961 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert F. Jones
did not have reasonable suspicion that he was armed and therefore the officer’s patdown search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19063 - 2005-07-18
did not have reasonable suspicion that he was armed and therefore the officer’s patdown search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19063 - 2005-07-18
COURT OF APPEALS
did not establish either a substantial change in circumstances warranting maintenance modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81500 - 2012-04-24
did not establish either a substantial change in circumstances warranting maintenance modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81500 - 2012-04-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
plea did not establish jurisdiction or venue in Wisconsin. He also contends he should be permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93190 - 2014-09-15
plea did not establish jurisdiction or venue in Wisconsin. He also contends he should be permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93190 - 2014-09-15
William James Schmidt v. Gerald Schmidt
¾the amount of Gerald’s outstanding principal balance on the May 1983 note. Gerald did not execute a renewal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13533 - 2005-03-31
¾the amount of Gerald’s outstanding principal balance on the May 1983 note. Gerald did not execute a renewal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13533 - 2005-03-31