Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3121 - 3130 of 51054 for address.

State v. D.L.S. - 2003AP000297
with credible evidence of another home address.[3] ¶4 Ashley was placed in foster care
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6126 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. D.L.S. - 2003AP000297
., however, failed to provide the social worker with credible evidence of another home address. 3 ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6126 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Brandon S. Sturm - 2017AP000180
, the circuit court denied the motion. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194889 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Scott E. Szerlong - 2019AP000685
. The no-merit report addresses whether Szerlong’s pleas were entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300438 - 2020-10-29

[PDF] State v. David M. Hudnut - 2022AP000062
The no-merit report addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a challenge to Hudnut’s no-contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749724 - 2024-01-11

[PDF] James Scott v. Kevin A. Carr - 2018AP002151
the Secretary with an authenticated copy of the writ, Scott’s appellate brief does not address the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265071 - 2020-06-23

[PDF] State v. R.V.M. - 2021AP001046
exercise of discretion. We address each issue. Before accepting a juvenile’s admission to facts alleged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=514173 - 2022-04-26

[PDF] State v. T. M. H. - 2022AP000366
rights, and T.M.H. appealed. The no-merit report first addresses whether the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=518111 - 2022-05-03

State v. Orbbie Williams - 2004AP002397
addressed each of the three primary sentencing factors and explained its reasons for the sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19806 - 2005-10-03

[PDF] Maple Grove Country Club Inc. v. Maple Grove Estates Sanitary District - 2016AP002296
dismissing its statutory claim of inverse condemnation. Addressing only the limited issue on which we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211389 - 2018-04-19