Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3101 - 3110 of 66208 for did.
Search results 3101 - 3110 of 66208 for did.
State v. Melvin E. Vance - 2003AP002993
White, Vance’s girlfriend at the time, testified she was a passenger in the van but did not know what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7026 - 2005-03-31
White, Vance’s girlfriend at the time, testified she was a passenger in the van but did not know what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7026 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael P. McGarry v. Ruth Zambo - 2023AP000119
it determined that a 2020 quitclaim deed did not revoke a 2016 transfer-on-death (“TOD”) beneficiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780085 - 2024-03-27
it determined that a 2020 quitclaim deed did not revoke a 2016 transfer-on-death (“TOD”) beneficiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780085 - 2024-03-27
Donna M. Umnus v. Gerald T. Umnus - 2010AP003006
did not establish either a substantial change in circumstances warranting maintenance modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81500 - 2012-04-24
did not establish either a substantial change in circumstances warranting maintenance modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81500 - 2012-04-24
State v. Kristina K. Kuykendall - 2012AP001701
, “They just—they followed Emily is what they did they followed her there, some personal things going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96321 - 2013-05-06
, “They just—they followed Emily is what they did they followed her there, some personal things going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96321 - 2013-05-06
[PDF]
State v. Kristina K. Kuykendall - 2012AP001701
at her. Johnson explained, “They just—they followed Emily is what they did they followed her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96321 - 2014-09-15
at her. Johnson explained, “They just—they followed Emily is what they did they followed her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96321 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Nasif Salaam Hibbler - 2020AP001180
concluded that Hibbler No. 2020AP1180-CR 3 did not lack substantial capacity to appreciate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=414590 - 2021-08-24
concluded that Hibbler No. 2020AP1180-CR 3 did not lack substantial capacity to appreciate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=414590 - 2021-08-24
[PDF]
State v. Daniel S. Kosinski - 2014AP001550
sentence. Kosinski argued that the State did not prove the repeater allegation and that the court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144544 - 2017-09-21
sentence. Kosinski argued that the State did not prove the repeater allegation and that the court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144544 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daniel S. Kosinski - 2014AP001550
, seeking to vacate the repeater enhancement component of his sentence. Kosinski argued that the State did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144544 - 2015-07-13
, seeking to vacate the repeater enhancement component of his sentence. Kosinski argued that the State did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144544 - 2015-07-13
[PDF]
State v. Robert F. Jones - 2005AP000126
paraphernalia and obstructing an officer. He argues the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19063 - 2017-09-21
paraphernalia and obstructing an officer. He argues the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19063 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert F. Jones - 2005AP000126
did not have reasonable suspicion that he was armed and therefore the officer’s patdown search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19063 - 2005-07-18
did not have reasonable suspicion that he was armed and therefore the officer’s patdown search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19063 - 2005-07-18