Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3081 - 3090 of 14307 for probate.
Search results 3081 - 3090 of 14307 for probate.
State v. Bryan S. Campbell - 2000AP000655
of a social worker violated a privilege; (9) statements made to a probation officer were involuntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2358 - 2005-03-31
of a social worker violated a privilege; (9) statements made to a probation officer were involuntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2358 - 2005-03-31
State v. Wameng Vang - 2002AP002045
was the subject of a probation hold, the police took Vang into custody. Given this chain of events, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5519 - 2005-03-31
was the subject of a probation hold, the police took Vang into custody. Given this chain of events, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5519 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Wameng Vang - 2002AP002045
thereafter. After the police identified Vang and upon learning that he was the subject of a probation hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5519 - 2017-09-19
thereafter. After the police identified Vang and upon learning that he was the subject of a probation hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5519 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Sean Patrick Okray - 1997AP002973
since his arrest because Okray’s probation had been revoked on a prior forgery conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13126 - 2017-09-21
since his arrest because Okray’s probation had been revoked on a prior forgery conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13126 - 2017-09-21
State v. Sean Patrick Okray - 1997AP002973
his arrest because Okray’s probation had been revoked on a prior forgery conviction, and Okray’s time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13126 - 2005-03-31
his arrest because Okray’s probation had been revoked on a prior forgery conviction, and Okray’s time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13126 - 2005-03-31
The Estate of Richmond P. Izard v. Richmond P. Izard - 2002AP003107
may have had in probating the estate, we remand with directions. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5905 - 2005-03-31
may have had in probating the estate, we remand with directions. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5905 - 2005-03-31
Kenosha County v. Blaire A. Frett - 2014AP000006
if the person has not been convicted of a subsequent offense and, if on probation, the probation has not been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129267 - 2014-12-18
if the person has not been convicted of a subsequent offense and, if on probation, the probation has not been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129267 - 2014-12-18
[PDF]
Kenosha County v. Blaire A. Frett - 2014AP000006
completed the sentence if the person has not been convicted of a subsequent offense and, if on probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129267 - 2017-09-21
completed the sentence if the person has not been convicted of a subsequent offense and, if on probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129267 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Amber C. Debree - 2022AP001311
the sentencing court2 that Debree had “been on probation several times[,]” the last being completed in 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618482 - 2023-02-08
the sentencing court2 that Debree had “been on probation several times[,]” the last being completed in 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618482 - 2023-02-08
[PDF]
State v. Jessie James - 2021AP001226
Fourth, James argues that the sentencing court erred because “it made no mention of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529357 - 2022-06-07
Fourth, James argues that the sentencing court erred because “it made no mention of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529357 - 2022-06-07