Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3061 - 3070 of 29009 for committing.
Search results 3061 - 3070 of 29009 for committing.
State v. Shawn P. Krawczyk - 1997AP001673
that Krawczyk had committed an offense. (a) Standard of Review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12598 - 2005-03-31
that Krawczyk had committed an offense. (a) Standard of Review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12598 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Shawn P. Krawczyk - 1997AP001673
of an investigatory Terry stop, justified by reasonable suspicion that Krawczyk had committed an offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12598 - 2017-09-21
of an investigatory Terry stop, justified by reasonable suspicion that Krawczyk had committed an offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12598 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Beth LaBatte - 1998AP003677
committed by LaBatte to prove identity; and (2) admitting out-of-court statements that LaBatte made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14942 - 2017-09-21
committed by LaBatte to prove identity; and (2) admitting out-of-court statements that LaBatte made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14942 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael Brandt - 1997AP001489
that by pleading guilty to Count One, forgery, you are admitting you committed each of the elements of that crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12516 - 2017-09-21
that by pleading guilty to Count One, forgery, you are admitting you committed each of the elements of that crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12516 - 2017-09-21
State v. Beth LaBatte - 1998AP003677
erroneously exercised its discretion by: (1) admitting evidence of other crimes committed by LaBatte to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14942 - 2005-03-31
erroneously exercised its discretion by: (1) admitting evidence of other crimes committed by LaBatte to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14942 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Brandt - 1997AP001489
One, forgery, you are admitting you committed each of the elements of that crime, which are as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12516 - 2005-03-31
One, forgery, you are admitting you committed each of the elements of that crime, which are as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12516 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. McGinnis - 2018AP001388
and reasoned that Bell merely had reasonable suspicion—not probable cause—that McGinnis had committed a PAC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248344 - 2019-10-08
and reasoned that Bell merely had reasonable suspicion—not probable cause—that McGinnis had committed a PAC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248344 - 2019-10-08
[PDF]
State v. Graham L. Stowe - 2022AP000409
to watch him commit suicide. He also threatened to kill her father and sister. Stowe’s ex-girlfriend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701648 - 2023-09-12
to watch him commit suicide. He also threatened to kill her father and sister. Stowe’s ex-girlfriend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701648 - 2023-09-12
State v. Carl G. Ware - 2011AP000044
reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed, and a protective frisk for weapons is constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84417 - 2012-07-04
reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed, and a protective frisk for weapons is constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84417 - 2012-07-04
[PDF]
County of Buffalo v. Kevin J. Rich - 2020AP001526
because the arresting deputy: (1) lacked reasonable suspicion to believe that Rich had committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529233 - 2022-06-20
because the arresting deputy: (1) lacked reasonable suspicion to believe that Rich had committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529233 - 2022-06-20