Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3011 - 3020 of 38911 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] Kenosha Professional Firefighters v. City of Kenosha - 2007AP001198
the firefighters' petition insofar as the firefighters sought disclosure of a set of "matrix scores
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36828 - 2014-09-15

State v. Gilbert H. Butzlaff - 1996AP001577
as a prior inconsistent statement under § 908.01(4)(a)(1), Stats. The court decided that H.R.T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10904 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Gilbert H. Butzlaff - 1996AP001577
. The State asserted that Mathison's testimony was admissible as a prior inconsistent statement under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10904 - 2017-09-20

Paulette A. Klimpke v. Leonard J. La Roche - 2013AP002630
] We summarily affirm. By financial institution notice dated June 19, 2013, the Monroe County Child
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123951 - 2014-10-09

[PDF] Paulette A. Klimpke v. Leonard J. La Roche - 2013AP002630
We summarily affirm. By financial institution notice dated June 19, 2013, the Monroe County Child
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123951 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Harman - 1999AP002862
that the financial statement filed by Harman in this reinstatement proceeding was inaccurate because it did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18712 - 2005-06-23

Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Angel Navas - 2008AP002158
that he was on food stamps less than six months prior to the hearing and provided a financial statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35464 - 2009-02-10

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John R. Dade - 2013AP001733
, the court of appeals found that Attorney Dade had not filed a docketing statement and informed him
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119971 - 2014-08-20

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John R. Dade - 2013AP001733
statement and informed him that unless it was filed within five days, the appeal would be subject
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119971 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Andreco Jaiquin Threatt - 2017AP000672
.” Then, Threatt suggests, this “could have been compared to” DeWitt’s “statement at trial.” It is speculative
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289341 - 2020-09-22