Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2951 - 2960 of 19264 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 2951 - 2960 of 19264 for transfer by affidavit.
State v. Edward A. Stoetzel
motion to suppress that evidence. The dispositive issues are (1) whether the search warrant affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10830 - 2005-03-31
motion to suppress that evidence. The dispositive issues are (1) whether the search warrant affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10830 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
the affidavit in support of the warrant failed to establish probable cause that contraband would be found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60850 - 2014-09-15
the affidavit in support of the warrant failed to establish probable cause that contraband would be found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60850 - 2014-09-15
Fun-World 2, L.L.C. v. Joseph Konopka
to its computer system.[1] Fun-World argues that (1) the court erroneously disregarded the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5815 - 2005-03-31
to its computer system.[1] Fun-World argues that (1) the court erroneously disregarded the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5815 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Fun-World 2, L.L.C. v. Joseph Konopka
erroneously disregarded the affidavit of Fun-World’s owner, Samuel Graham, as a “sham” affidavit; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5815 - 2017-09-19
erroneously disregarded the affidavit of Fun-World’s owner, Samuel Graham, as a “sham” affidavit; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5815 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 21-04 - Comments from Christina J. Gilbert, Senior Youth Policy Counsel, The Gault Center, National Juvenile Defender Center
of Support (“Memo”)v and supporting documents.vi Dr. Coffey and Ms. Rodrik’s Affidavit asserts
/supreme/docs/2104commentsgilbert.pdf - 2021-12-23
of Support (“Memo”)v and supporting documents.vi Dr. Coffey and Ms. Rodrik’s Affidavit asserts
/supreme/docs/2104commentsgilbert.pdf - 2021-12-23
James P. Zientek v. Robert C. Smith
and that an affidavit of correction filed by the surveyor had no impact on the prior judgment.[1] The Smiths cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9133 - 2005-03-31
and that an affidavit of correction filed by the surveyor had no impact on the prior judgment.[1] The Smiths cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9133 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James P. Zientek v. Robert C. Smith
and that an affidavit of correction filed by the surveyor had no impact on the prior judgment.1 The Smiths cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9133 - 2017-09-19
and that an affidavit of correction filed by the surveyor had no impact on the prior judgment.1 The Smiths cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9133 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 14
for summary judgment and for sanctions against M.J. On December 12, 2002, M.J. signed an affidavit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32004 - 2014-09-15
for summary judgment and for sanctions against M.J. On December 12, 2002, M.J. signed an affidavit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32004 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
for summary judgment and for sanctions against M.J. On December 12, 2002, M.J. signed an affidavit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32004 - 2008-03-03
for summary judgment and for sanctions against M.J. On December 12, 2002, M.J. signed an affidavit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32004 - 2008-03-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to testify. In support of that claim, Cotton filed an affidavit from an associate attorney employed by his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101743 - 2017-09-21
to testify. In support of that claim, Cotton filed an affidavit from an associate attorney employed by his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101743 - 2017-09-21