Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2931 - 2940 of 15401 for probate.
Search results 2931 - 2940 of 15401 for probate.
CA Blank Order
sentence and ordered two years of probation. On the possession count, the court withheld sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144507 - 2015-07-12
sentence and ordered two years of probation. On the possession count, the court withheld sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144507 - 2015-07-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ probation with four months’ conditional jail time imposed and stayed. The circuit court accepted Berry’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682386 - 2023-07-25
’ probation with four months’ conditional jail time imposed and stayed. The circuit court accepted Berry’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682386 - 2023-07-25
State v. Randolph M. Martin
on probation for three years, with four months of conditional jail time. ¶4 Martin now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6327 - 2005-03-31
on probation for three years, with four months of conditional jail time. ¶4 Martin now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6327 - 2005-03-31
State v. Reginald D. Moore
sentencing him, after revocation of his probation, to five years in prison for bail jumping. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2588 - 2005-03-31
sentencing him, after revocation of his probation, to five years in prison for bail jumping. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2588 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patricia A. McTavish
to four days in jail as a condition of probation after being convicted of possessing a controlled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15857 - 2017-09-21
to four days in jail as a condition of probation after being convicted of possessing a controlled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15857 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles R. Wincek
to recommend three thirty-day jail sentences, to be served consecutively, followed by probation on the fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10692 - 2005-03-31
to recommend three thirty-day jail sentences, to be served consecutively, followed by probation on the fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10692 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the remaining charges and join in defense counsel’s recommendation for twelve months’ probation with thirty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165253 - 2017-09-21
in the remaining charges and join in defense counsel’s recommendation for twelve months’ probation with thirty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165253 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on probation for twelve months. The no-merit report addresses whether Garrett’s pleas were entered knowingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629825 - 2023-03-08
on probation for twelve months. The no-merit report addresses whether Garrett’s pleas were entered knowingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629825 - 2023-03-08
State v. Carl E. Cunningham
probation. We affirm for the reasons discussed below. ¶2 Cunningham was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6654 - 2005-03-31
probation. We affirm for the reasons discussed below. ¶2 Cunningham was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6654 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of his probation, and from an order denying postconviction relief. Giebel contends that a conflict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109909 - 2014-04-08
of his probation, and from an order denying postconviction relief. Giebel contends that a conflict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109909 - 2014-04-08