Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2891 - 2900 of 66208 for did.

[PDF] State v. William H. Warren - 1995AP003185
to pause for four or five seconds before he could finish. Although Warren claimed that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9982 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Harry S. Bernstein - 1998AP002259
argues, is required under § 980.05(2), STATS. We conclude Bernstein did consent to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14351 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. James B. Lussier - 2022AP000184
Lussier away, however, and told him to go to Iron County. Lussier did not do so, and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607774 - 2023-01-05

State v. Norman G.K. - 1998AP003455
an attorney and because the trial court did not err by refusing to permit him to supplement the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14851 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Sidney H. Sawicky - 2013AP001335
because Sawicky did not make 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104473 - 2017-09-21

State v. Sidney H. Sawicky - 2013AP001335
competency to consider Sawicky’s request because Sawicky did not make his request within the ten-day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104473 - 2013-11-18

State v. Rodney G. Zivcic - 1998AP000909
to attempt Zivcic’s breath test following his arrest. Because Zivcic did not raise any objection to the six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13816 - 2005-03-31

Mollie Place v. City of Milwaukee - 2003AP003450
of Eighth Street to pick up passengers. Place claimed that she looked both ways and, after she did not see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7177 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Mollie Place v. City of Milwaukee - 2003AP003450
claimed that she looked both ways and, after she did not see any cars, drove into the intersection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7177 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Luke J. Wierzchowski - 2008AP000065
that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because trial counsel did not file a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34840 - 2014-09-15