Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2871 - 2880 of 68458 for did.
Search results 2871 - 2880 of 68458 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statement at one point to state that he did not know who shot him, he testified at trial that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64699 - 2014-09-15
statement at one point to state that he did not know who shot him, he testified at trial that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64699 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Shaun E. Kelley
, based on an illegal search of his apartment. Because the trial court did not err in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18776 - 2017-09-21
, based on an illegal search of his apartment. Because the trial court did not err in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18776 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
that Majette’s motion was also insufficient to warrant a hearing because Majette did not identify any additional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102445 - 2013-09-25
that Majette’s motion was also insufficient to warrant a hearing because Majette did not identify any additional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102445 - 2013-09-25
State v. David M. Womble
was ineffective because he did not file a motion to conduct an individual voir dire of the officers on the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15294 - 2005-03-31
was ineffective because he did not file a motion to conduct an individual voir dire of the officers on the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15294 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jose Trevino
to effective assistance of counsel was violated because his trial counsel did not properly impeach the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12630 - 2005-03-31
to effective assistance of counsel was violated because his trial counsel did not properly impeach the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12630 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
in this opinion, the Gebhardts’ intentions did not preclude summary judgment on the private nuisance claim. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47195 - 2014-09-15
in this opinion, the Gebhardts’ intentions did not preclude summary judgment on the private nuisance claim. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47195 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Carlos A. Abadia
because, he claims, the trial court did not explain, and he did not understand, the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24990 - 2017-09-21
because, he claims, the trial court did not explain, and he did not understand, the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24990 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael J.K.
client. When the fact-finding hearing resumed, he called Michael to testify. Counsel did not ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15909 - 2017-09-21
client. When the fact-finding hearing resumed, he called Michael to testify. Counsel did not ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15909 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eva M. Bakken
stop and arrest of Bakken, including her statement that she did not consume any intoxicating beverages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8461 - 2005-03-31
stop and arrest of Bakken, including her statement that she did not consume any intoxicating beverages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8461 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Beth E. Zurkowski
: (1) the criminal complaints did not provide adequate notice of the charges against them; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4845 - 2017-09-19
: (1) the criminal complaints did not provide adequate notice of the charges against them; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4845 - 2017-09-19