Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2771 - 2780 of 68463 for did.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 30, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
sprayed air freshener in the car. The trooper did not notice Roberts fumble in retrieving his driver’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66885 - 2011-06-29

[PDF] Melvin Kempf v. Michael D. Lilek
frequency. From 1980 until 1993, Melvin worked as a ginseng farmer and the Kempfs did not use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5055 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that Roberts or his passenger had sprayed air freshener in the car. The trooper did not notice Roberts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66885 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of service indicated he had been served but he did not respond or appear at the November 10 hearing. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220077 - 2018-10-03

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
physical restraints. We conclude that trial counsel did not perform deficiently, and that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656430 - 2023-05-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
not demonstrated his attorney performed deficiently. His trial counsel did, in fact, interpose an objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222252 - 2018-10-16

Melvin Kempf v. Michael D. Lilek
did not use their cottage as much as they had previously. After Melvin sold his farming operation, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5055 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Connie L. Boss v. Jerry E. Boss
of $347 per month. For the purpose of awarding maintenance, however, the court did not include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12842 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Kristin Galatowitsch v. James Wanat
they did not receive it; that election, the Wanats contend, precludes the Galatowitsches from amending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2179 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
in their proper procedural posture. Trial counsel did not object to the admission of the evidence that Doyle now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30607 - 2007-10-16