Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2751 - 2760 of 68458 for did.
Search results 2751 - 2760 of 68458 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
that he “did not know the penalties involved for an OWI 2nd offense when he purportedly waived his rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69382 - 2011-08-10
that he “did not know the penalties involved for an OWI 2nd offense when he purportedly waived his rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69382 - 2011-08-10
[PDF]
Green Lake State Bank v. Price Court, LLC
that the circuit court did not misuse its discretion in confirming the sale because the sale price did not shock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25486 - 2017-09-21
that the circuit court did not misuse its discretion in confirming the sale because the sale price did not shock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25486 - 2017-09-21
State v. William Backhaus
that even if the trial court did commit error, there is no reasonable possibility that the error contributed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9356 - 2005-03-31
that even if the trial court did commit error, there is no reasonable possibility that the error contributed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9356 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William Backhaus
conclude that even if the trial court did commit error, there is no reasonable possibility that the error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9356 - 2017-09-19
conclude that even if the trial court did commit error, there is no reasonable possibility that the error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9356 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Mae Neugart v. Lori Bell
misled the circuit court. She contends that we raised and disposed of an issue that the parties did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20562 - 2017-09-21
misled the circuit court. She contends that we raised and disposed of an issue that the parties did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20562 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion on the grounds that Broomfield had failed to allege that he did not know or understand the omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91093 - 2013-01-02
the motion on the grounds that Broomfield had failed to allege that he did not know or understand the omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91093 - 2013-01-02
Mae Neugart v. Lori Bell
that the parties did not raise and that we did so in a way that was highly likely to mislead the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20562 - 2005-12-07
that the parties did not raise and that we did so in a way that was highly likely to mislead the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20562 - 2005-12-07
COURT OF APPEALS
by the court. The divorce judgment did not further address the issue, however. ¶3 Gunn did eventually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31964 - 2008-02-27
by the court. The divorce judgment did not further address the issue, however. ¶3 Gunn did eventually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31964 - 2008-02-27
Green Lake State Bank v. Price Court, LLC
that the circuit court did not misuse its discretion in confirming the sale because the sale price did not shock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25486 - 2006-06-13
that the circuit court did not misuse its discretion in confirming the sale because the sale price did not shock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25486 - 2006-06-13
City of La Crosse v. Neil Collins
, Stats. The City contends that the petition did not meet the statutory requirement of § 66.014(2)(c)[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13137 - 2005-03-31
, Stats. The City contends that the petition did not meet the statutory requirement of § 66.014(2)(c)[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13137 - 2005-03-31