Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2721 - 2730 of 68463 for did.
Search results 2721 - 2730 of 68463 for did.
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Phyliss K. T.
did in the trial court, that trial counsel was ineffective for: (1) failing to hire a psychologist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4033 - 2005-03-31
did in the trial court, that trial counsel was ineffective for: (1) failing to hire a psychologist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4033 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, the Board adopted, without change, the findings and analysis in the proposed decision. The Board did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70385 - 2011-08-31
, the Board adopted, without change, the findings and analysis in the proposed decision. The Board did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70385 - 2011-08-31
Gary Hannemann v. Craig Boyson
(opinion filed). Not Participating: PROSSER, J., did not participate. Attorneys
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18794 - 2005-06-28
(opinion filed). Not Participating: PROSSER, J., did not participate. Attorneys
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18794 - 2005-06-28
[PDF]
Gary Hannemann v. Craig Boyson
: BUTLER, JR., J., dissents (opinion filed). NOT PARTICIPATING: PROSSER, J., did not participate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18794 - 2017-09-21
: BUTLER, JR., J., dissents (opinion filed). NOT PARTICIPATING: PROSSER, J., did not participate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18794 - 2017-09-21
State v. Fradario L. Brim
where Anderson was shot. He did not, however, see Anderson shot. Trial counsel testified that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5336 - 2005-03-31
where Anderson was shot. He did not, however, see Anderson shot. Trial counsel testified that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5336 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to a new trial because he did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his right to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032480 - 2025-11-05
to a new trial because he did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his right to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032480 - 2025-11-05
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion to withdraw his plea. Lay contends (1) he did not understand the consequences of entering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51998 - 2010-07-12
his motion to withdraw his plea. Lay contends (1) he did not understand the consequences of entering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51998 - 2010-07-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was engrave[d] on the back of the watch or who did it…. The watch was altered by another person or by Bartz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859021 - 2024-10-10
was engrave[d] on the back of the watch or who did it…. The watch was altered by another person or by Bartz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859021 - 2024-10-10
Socorro Angelica Alfaro v. Jerry Frick
the premises. We affirm because the lease was a tenancy for a term and because Alfaro did not prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7344 - 2005-03-31
the premises. We affirm because the lease was a tenancy for a term and because Alfaro did not prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7344 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the search warrant affidavit did not support a finding of probable cause. There is no merit to this issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107037 - 2017-09-21
that the search warrant affidavit did not support a finding of probable cause. There is no merit to this issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107037 - 2017-09-21