Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 271 - 280 of 66224 for did.

[PDF] State v. Robert N. Kroeplin - 2003AP002060
Kuechenmeister read the Informing the Accused. Kroeplin never indicated that he did not understand the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6729 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Nikolas S. Czysz - 2017AP001611
) the pleadings were untimely and (2) they did not state a basis for relief available to Czysz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221851 - 2018-10-17

State v. Robert N. Kroeplin - 2003AP002060
that he did not understand the form. Kroeplin consented to the blood test. ¶4 Kroeplin testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6729 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Thomas J. Eickner - 2019AP000808
that Eickner did not establish a fair and just reason in support of his motion to withdraw his no contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417443 - 2021-09-01

State v. Perri R. Voge - 2010AP002893
response to the jury did not constitute plain error. We affirm. Background ¶2 In September 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74288 - 2011-11-22

[PDF] State v. Perri R. Voge - 2010AP002893
of counsel. We also conclude that the court’s response to the jury did not constitute plain error. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74288 - 2014-09-15

State v. Steven M. Kuenzi - 1998AP000773
and disoriented. After initially stating that he did not remember what had happened, Kuenzi said he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13759 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Anthony R. Popke - 2009AP001690
to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did not establish a factual basis for the plea, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48820 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. David Karich - 1996AP001485
, the letter asserted that the plea colloquy did not comply with the requirements of § 971.08, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10870 - 2017-09-20

State v. David Karich - 1996AP001485
, the letter asserted that the plea colloquy did not comply with the requirements of § 971.08, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10870 - 2005-03-31