Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2661 - 2670 of 66207 for did.
Search results 2661 - 2670 of 66207 for did.
[PDF]
State v. John Joseph Casper - 2019AP001662
is entitled to resentencing because he did not have an adequate opportunity to review or rebut electronic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350167 - 2021-03-30
is entitled to resentencing because he did not have an adequate opportunity to review or rebut electronic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350167 - 2021-03-30
Richard L. Aeby v. Peggy A. Laska - 2006AP000191
side of the lot line. He did not remove snow from that portion, and Laska made her own arrangements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26070 - 2006-08-01
side of the lot line. He did not remove snow from that portion, and Laska made her own arrangements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26070 - 2006-08-01
[PDF]
State v. Diane M. Mikic - 1997AP000935
on the grounds that she was in custody, had invoked her right to counsel and did not give voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12297 - 2014-09-15
on the grounds that she was in custody, had invoked her right to counsel and did not give voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12297 - 2014-09-15
Michael B. Sandy v. - 1997AP000623
. Attorney Sandy told the client he would do so but never did, with the result that the client was assessed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17223 - 2005-03-31
. Attorney Sandy told the client he would do so but never did, with the result that the client was assessed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17223 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Brandt - 1997AP001489
refusal to allow him to withdraw his guilty pleas.[1] Brandt contends that he did not understand
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17268 - 2005-03-31
refusal to allow him to withdraw his guilty pleas.[1] Brandt contends that he did not understand
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17268 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gerald D. Taylor - 2011AP001030
years in prison or both." Though the court mentioned the repeater allegation several times, it did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95830 - 2013-04-22
years in prison or both." Though the court mentioned the repeater allegation several times, it did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95830 - 2013-04-22
[PDF]
State v. Gerald D. Taylor - 2011AP001030
the court mentioned the repeater allegation several times, it did not explicitly inform Taylor during
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95830 - 2014-09-15
the court mentioned the repeater allegation several times, it did not explicitly inform Taylor during
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95830 - 2014-09-15
Melvin Kempf v. Michael D. Lilek - 2002AP000750
did not use their cottage as much as they had previously. After Melvin sold his farming operation, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5055 - 2005-03-31
did not use their cottage as much as they had previously. After Melvin sold his farming operation, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5055 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Melvin Kempf v. Michael D. Lilek - 2002AP000750
frequency. From 1980 until 1993, Melvin worked as a ginseng farmer and the Kempfs did not use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5055 - 2017-09-19
frequency. From 1980 until 1993, Melvin worked as a ginseng farmer and the Kempfs did not use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5055 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph D. Haas - 1999AP002333
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ΒΆ4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15953 - 2017-09-21
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ΒΆ4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15953 - 2017-09-21