Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2601 - 2610 of 67241 for had.
Search results 2601 - 2610 of 67241 for had.
[PDF]
State v. Jessie White - 1995AP003086
had five prior convictions and when counsel did not request a presentence report. Additionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9936 - 2017-09-19
had five prior convictions and when counsel did not request a presentence report. Additionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9936 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jessie White - 1995AP003086
. The no merit report also addresses whether trial counsel was ineffective when counsel stipulated that White had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9936 - 2005-03-31
. The no merit report also addresses whether trial counsel was ineffective when counsel stipulated that White had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9936 - 2005-03-31
State v. Johnny L. White - 1996AP002742
. He argues that the trial court erred in excluding evidence that the victim had a sexually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11473 - 2005-03-31
. He argues that the trial court erred in excluding evidence that the victim had a sexually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11473 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Johnny L. White - 1996AP002742
evidence that the victim had a sexually transmittable condition and that semen collections found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11473 - 2017-09-19
evidence that the victim had a sexually transmittable condition and that semen collections found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11473 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Juan Jose DeJesus-Torres - 2007AP002624
. In the § 974.06 motion, DeJesus-Torres argued that his plea was invalid because his lawyer had failed to explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33275 - 2014-09-15
. In the § 974.06 motion, DeJesus-Torres argued that his plea was invalid because his lawyer had failed to explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33275 - 2014-09-15
State v. Antonio M. Settles - 2000AP002598
Winters “we have your car” with two children in it, Winters responded by saying that Settles had the car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3067 - 2005-03-31
Winters “we have your car” with two children in it, Winters responded by saying that Settles had the car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3067 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lorenzo D. Harris - 2008AP000621
the driver, Harris’s accomplice shot the front-seat passenger because he thought the passenger had a gun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36153 - 2014-09-15
the driver, Harris’s accomplice shot the front-seat passenger because he thought the passenger had a gun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36153 - 2014-09-15
State v. Lorenzo D. Harris - 2008AP000621
the driver, Harris’s accomplice shot the front-seat passenger because he thought the passenger had a gun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36153 - 2009-04-13
the driver, Harris’s accomplice shot the front-seat passenger because he thought the passenger had a gun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36153 - 2009-04-13
[PDF]
State v. Xay Vang - 2013AP001825
. No. 2013AP1825-CRNM 2 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Vang was advised that he had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108096 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2013AP1825-CRNM 2 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Vang was advised that he had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108096 - 2017-09-21
State v. Xay Vang - 2013AP001825
(1967). Vang was advised that he had a right to respond, but he did not do so. After considering
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108096 - 2014-02-11
(1967). Vang was advised that he had a right to respond, but he did not do so. After considering
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108096 - 2014-02-11