Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 261 - 270 of 492 for ot.

State v. Randy L. Martin - 2010AP000505
are the ‘functional equivalent’ of express questioning.” Cunningham, 144 Wis. 2d at 277. However, “[n]ot all police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63470 - 2011-05-02

[PDF] State v. Randy L. Martin - 2010AP000505
, 144 Wis. 2d at 277. However, “[n]ot all police conduct that may cause a defendant to speak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63470 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. N.H. - 2021AP002035
did not attempt to initiate contact with them because she was “[n]ot sure that [she] was able
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485107 - 2022-02-22

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Merlin W. - 2008AP002704
[ot] in a little bit of trouble” because he wanted to be transferred to the Stanley Correctional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35587 - 2009-02-16

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Merlin W. - 2008AP002704
it was not a quality program in his view. Instead, he appears to suggest he “g[ot] in a little bit of trouble
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35587 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Sophea Mouth - 2018AP001153
for years,” and shot the men due to long- building anger, “[n]ot because [he was] in fear of great bodily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242863 - 2019-06-27

[PDF] May 2007 Table of Unpublished Opinions
or th is r ea so n m ay n ot b e ci te d in a ny c ou rt o f th is s ta te
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29389 - 2014-09-15

State v. Michael Mario Miller, Jr. - 2010AP000399
, but on cross-examination, he admitted that he had “[n]ot quite” done so. Miller explained that when he started
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61122 - 2011-03-14

[PDF] State v. Michael Mario Miller, Jr. - 2010AP000399
that he had invoked his right to counsel, but on cross-examination, he admitted that he had “[n]ot quite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61122 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Cheryl Cody v. Target Corporation - 2011AP002831
However, “[n]ot all destruction, alteration, or loss of evidence qualifies as spoliation.” Insurance Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98614 - 2014-09-15