Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2541 - 2550 of 68458 for did.
Search results 2541 - 2550 of 68458 for did.
State v. Jerome Sellars
. We conclude that the trial court did not err in denying Sellars’ postconviction motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12792 - 2005-03-31
. We conclude that the trial court did not err in denying Sellars’ postconviction motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12792 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jerome Sellars
court did not err in denying Sellars’ postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12792 - 2017-09-21
court did not err in denying Sellars’ postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12792 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he had been “holding [the key fob] for somebody” and did not know what vehicle the key fob
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260107 - 2020-05-12
that he had been “holding [the key fob] for somebody” and did not know what vehicle the key fob
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260107 - 2020-05-12
COURT OF APPEALS
to a Sheriff’s Department memo sent to Dawn and the court that Craig did not receive. Craig argued in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140357 - 2015-04-22
to a Sheriff’s Department memo sent to Dawn and the court that Craig did not receive. Craig argued in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140357 - 2015-04-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” He further stated that he “did not reinitiate questioning nor did he knowingly and intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417730 - 2021-08-31
.” He further stated that he “did not reinitiate questioning nor did he knowingly and intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417730 - 2021-08-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, including because Sims did not see Scolman fire the shots. ¶5 The State asked the trial court to accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44552 - 2014-09-15
, including because Sims did not see Scolman fire the shots. ¶5 The State asked the trial court to accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44552 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
—without contact with Adam, and based on DesArmo’s observations, it did not concern Sam. Aside from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868101 - 2024-10-30
—without contact with Adam, and based on DesArmo’s observations, it did not concern Sam. Aside from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868101 - 2024-10-30
[PDF]
John M. Maciolek v. Patrick L. Ross
asserting they did and Ross asserting they did not. The Macioleks filed this action alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26544 - 2017-09-21
asserting they did and Ross asserting they did not. The Macioleks filed this action alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26544 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
this.” At this point, Beamon’s hand was outside of the child’s shorts. The child did not say anything, and “just tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54125 - 2010-09-07
this.” At this point, Beamon’s hand was outside of the child’s shorts. The child did not say anything, and “just tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54125 - 2010-09-07
[PDF]
Disposition table - July 2018
court judgment reinstated). Bradley, A. W., J. did not participate. 07/10/2018 2017AP516
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218961 - 2018-09-07
court judgment reinstated). Bradley, A. W., J. did not participate. 07/10/2018 2017AP516
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218961 - 2018-09-07