Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2521 - 2530 of 68463 for did.
Search results 2521 - 2530 of 68463 for did.
State v. Marty R. Caban
did not have probable cause to believe that defendant-appellant Marty Caban's automobile contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7838 - 2005-03-31
did not have probable cause to believe that defendant-appellant Marty Caban's automobile contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7838 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as required for the commitment order. I conclude that the circuit court did not make sufficiently specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888389 - 2024-12-12
as required for the commitment order. I conclude that the circuit court did not make sufficiently specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888389 - 2024-12-12
[PDF]
State v. Wade L. Huggins
must be vacated because the State did not file a motion to enter judgment against him as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10550 - 2017-09-20
must be vacated because the State did not file a motion to enter judgment against him as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10550 - 2017-09-20
John M. Maciolek v. Patrick L. Ross
subsequently arose over whether the parties had a binding contract, with the Macioleks asserting they did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26544 - 2006-09-20
subsequently arose over whether the parties had a binding contract, with the Macioleks asserting they did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26544 - 2006-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. The State explained why this amendment was reasonable, including because Sims did not see Scolman fire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44552 - 2009-12-14
. The State explained why this amendment was reasonable, including because Sims did not see Scolman fire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44552 - 2009-12-14
State v. Jerome Sellars
. We conclude that the trial court did not err in denying Sellars’ postconviction motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12792 - 2005-03-31
. We conclude that the trial court did not err in denying Sellars’ postconviction motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12792 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” He further stated that he “did not reinitiate questioning nor did he knowingly and intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417730 - 2021-08-31
.” He further stated that he “did not reinitiate questioning nor did he knowingly and intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417730 - 2021-08-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, including because Sims did not see Scolman fire the shots. ¶5 The State asked the trial court to accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44552 - 2014-09-15
, including because Sims did not see Scolman fire the shots. ¶5 The State asked the trial court to accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44552 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
John M. Maciolek v. Patrick L. Ross
asserting they did and Ross asserting they did not. The Macioleks filed this action alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26544 - 2017-09-21
asserting they did and Ross asserting they did not. The Macioleks filed this action alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26544 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
this.” At this point, Beamon’s hand was outside of the child’s shorts. The child did not say anything, and “just tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54125 - 2010-09-07
this.” At this point, Beamon’s hand was outside of the child’s shorts. The child did not say anything, and “just tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54125 - 2010-09-07