Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 66207 for did.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 66207 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Roscoe Patterson - 1997AP001789
. The police evidence technician testified that he did not notice the marijuana roaches until Kopesky pointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12650 - 2017-09-21
. The police evidence technician testified that he did not notice the marijuana roaches until Kopesky pointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12650 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jamaica Wilson - 2019AP002188
Wis. 2d at 181-82. To show a sufficient reason why Wilson did not raise these claims in his first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345091 - 2021-03-11
Wis. 2d at 181-82. To show a sufficient reason why Wilson did not raise these claims in his first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345091 - 2021-03-11
State v. Victor Darrel Jackson - 2012AP001458
for his role in the death of Floyd Edwards. In his postconviction motion, Jackson alleged that he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105853 - 2013-12-16
for his role in the death of Floyd Edwards. In his postconviction motion, Jackson alleged that he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105853 - 2013-12-16
[PDF]
State v. Gene P. Ganta - 2006AP000666
is whether Ganta validly waived his right to counsel. We conclude that he did and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27612 - 2014-09-15
is whether Ganta validly waived his right to counsel. We conclude that he did and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27612 - 2014-09-15
State v. Lamar S. Westbrook - 2005AP001729
made to police because the statements were not voluntary and did not represent his judgment or his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26889 - 2006-10-23
made to police because the statements were not voluntary and did not represent his judgment or his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26889 - 2006-10-23
City of Durand v. Thomas William Dettinger - 1997AP000903
in the traffic citation did not affect Dettinger's substantial rights, and therefore the trial court's judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12288 - 2005-03-31
in the traffic citation did not affect Dettinger's substantial rights, and therefore the trial court's judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12288 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darryl H. Stegall - 1997AP003623
) he did not actually stipulate that the complaint provided a factual basis for his plea; and (2) even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13384 - 2005-03-31
) he did not actually stipulate that the complaint provided a factual basis for his plea; and (2) even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13384 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Durand v. Thomas William Dettinger - 1997AP000903
of the charge against him. This technical error in the traffic citation did not affect Dettinger's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12288 - 2017-09-21
of the charge against him. This technical error in the traffic citation did not affect Dettinger's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12288 - 2017-09-21
State v. Anthony Kane - 1999AP000313
] pleas and alleges the violation of his right to a speedy trial. We conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15092 - 2005-03-31
] pleas and alleges the violation of his right to a speedy trial. We conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15092 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Darryl H. Stegall - 1997AP003623
. ANALYSIS On appeal, Stegall essentially claims that: (1) he did not actually stipulate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13384 - 2017-09-21
. ANALYSIS On appeal, Stegall essentially claims that: (1) he did not actually stipulate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13384 - 2017-09-21