Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2441 - 2450 of 68458 for did.
Search results 2441 - 2450 of 68458 for did.
Kenneth W. Rupena v. Palmer Johnson of Racine, Inc.
. That was not the basis of the trial court’s decision, and therefore, the court did not make appropriate findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4607 - 2005-03-31
. That was not the basis of the trial court’s decision, and therefore, the court did not make appropriate findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4607 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 The circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in declining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=392940 - 2021-07-21
. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 The circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in declining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=392940 - 2021-07-21
Shirley Y. Godiwalla, M.D. v. State of WI Medical Examining Bd.
that the Board did not cite substantial evidence in support of its finding that she did not meet the minimum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24985 - 2006-05-02
that the Board did not cite substantial evidence in support of its finding that she did not meet the minimum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24985 - 2006-05-02
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
not been properly instructed of her right to substitution of judge and that she did not know of that right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3703 - 2005-03-31
not been properly instructed of her right to substitution of judge and that she did not know of that right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3703 - 2005-03-31
State v. David L. Fries
conclude that the trial court did not err in denying the suppression motion. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11602 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the trial court did not err in denying the suppression motion. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11602 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
as party to the crime. During the plea colloquy, the circuit court did not inform Zepeda of one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97084 - 2013-05-21
as party to the crime. During the plea colloquy, the circuit court did not inform Zepeda of one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97084 - 2013-05-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael C. Cull
before he allegedly received this incorrect information. Because this court concludes that Cull did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13225 - 2017-09-21
before he allegedly received this incorrect information. Because this court concludes that Cull did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13225 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
been consuming alcohol prior to and while driving that day. Sonnenberg testified that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87060 - 2014-09-15
been consuming alcohol prior to and while driving that day. Sonnenberg testified that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87060 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kenneth W. Rupena v. Palmer Johnson of Racine, Inc.
, the court did not make appropriate findings or analysis on that issue. Further, Palmer Johnson’s brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4607 - 2017-09-19
, the court did not make appropriate findings or analysis on that issue. Further, Palmer Johnson’s brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4607 - 2017-09-19
State v. Wade T. Jones
in denying his motion to suppress evidence on the grounds that the deputy did not have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2251 - 2005-03-31
in denying his motion to suppress evidence on the grounds that the deputy did not have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2251 - 2005-03-31