Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2381 - 2390 of 66207 for did.

Adolph F. Cebula v. Thomas Cotter - 2000AP001427
court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in scheduling the hearing, and that it properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2635 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Wisconsin Children's Court Initiative Summary Report - Appendix B
= Yes 2 = No 3 = Can’t determine 4 = N/A 23. Did the GAL or adversary counsel
/courts/programs/docs/ccipsummaryreportapb.pdf - 2012-01-27

[PDF] State v. Marty R. Caban - 1994AP001015
. Because the police did not have probable cause to believe that defendant-appellant Marty Caban's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7838 - 2017-09-19

State v. Marty R. Caban - 1994AP001015
did not have probable cause to believe that defendant-appellant Marty Caban's automobile contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7838 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Wade L. Huggins - 1996AP000759
must be vacated because the State did not file a motion to enter judgment against him as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10550 - 2017-09-20

State v. Wade L. Huggins - 1996AP000759
must be vacated because the State did not file a motion to enter judgment against him as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10550 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Vicente Paul Vento - 2012AP001763
. Pankiewicz did not have adequate 2 All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97057 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jerome Sellars - 1997AP002149
court did not err in denying Sellars’ postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12792 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jerome Sellars - 1997AP002149
. We conclude that the trial court did not err in denying Sellars’ postconviction motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12792 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John M. Maciolek v. Patrick L. Ross - 2006AP000051
asserting they did and Ross asserting they did not. The Macioleks filed this action alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26544 - 2017-09-21