Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2361 - 2370 of 66207 for did.

[PDF] State v. James Perkins - 1999AP000582
injury, party to a crime. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15210 - 2017-09-21

State v. James Perkins - 1999AP000582
. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion and because the evidence is sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15210 - 2005-03-31

State v. Travis Allen - 2004AP002278
it admitted an incriminating custodial statement. Allen argues that he did not understand his Miranda rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18461 - 2005-06-06

[PDF] State v. Loteria Ln Harris - 2013AP001921
] to drop the firearm,” which she did and then “walked quickly into the crowd.” Fields was not able
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113299 - 2017-09-21

State v. Michael A. Olds - 1999AP002706
because the State failed to prove that the supplemental information in the hospital consent form did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16115 - 2005-03-31

State v. Christina V. - 2013AP000405
. Christina asked Brown to get in the car because they needed to talk. Brown testified he did not want to get
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97907 - 2013-06-10

State v. Mark A. Stephens - 2006AP002809
on the table and declared he did not want to talk to Detective Funkhouser anymore and referred to the detective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32501 - 2008-04-22

Ruth Hodge v. DOT - 2011AP001645
was in the eastern portion of her land. Hodge alleged that her remaining western access did not give her the ability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84169 - 2012-06-27

[PDF] Dawn H. v. Pah-Nasa B. - 2011AP001198
. He explained that for the last year and a half, Dawn did not want him to see Cayden and “rarely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74541 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Paul J. Fargo - 2010AP002578
the interview. Finally, the State asserted that the pre-interview contacts with the child did not render
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76501 - 2014-09-15