Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2321 - 2330 of 20762 for warrants.
Search results 2321 - 2330 of 20762 for warrants.
State v. Christopher L. Combs - 2005AP000859
into the calculation on an actuarial instrument—then a new hearing may be warranted. Often, however, a new expert
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20655 - 2005-12-14
into the calculation on an actuarial instrument—then a new hearing may be warranted. Often, however, a new expert
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20655 - 2005-12-14
[PDF]
State v. Savon D. Jones - 2023AP000157
. The substance tested positive for cocaine. Officers later obtained a search warrant for Jones’s cell phone
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704322 - 2023-09-19
. The substance tested positive for cocaine. Officers later obtained a search warrant for Jones’s cell phone
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704322 - 2023-09-19
Terry L. Benn v. James H. Benn - 1998AP002950
been a substantial change of circumstances sufficient to warrant a modification of maintenance or child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14631 - 2005-03-31
been a substantial change of circumstances sufficient to warrant a modification of maintenance or child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14631 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Terry L. Benn v. James H. Benn - 1998AP002950
to warrant a modification of maintenance or child support presents a mixed question of fact and law. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14631 - 2017-09-21
to warrant a modification of maintenance or child support presents a mixed question of fact and law. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14631 - 2017-09-21
State v. Deborah E. - 2001AP003307
“was not so egregious as to warrant termination.” ¶4 This court concludes: (1) Deborah
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4681 - 2005-03-31
“was not so egregious as to warrant termination.” ¶4 This court concludes: (1) Deborah
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4681 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deborah E. - 2001AP003306
“was not so egregious as to warrant termination.” ¶4 This court concludes: (1) Deborah
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4680 - 2005-03-31
“was not so egregious as to warrant termination.” ¶4 This court concludes: (1) Deborah
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4680 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deborah E. - 2001AP003308
“was not so egregious as to warrant termination.” ¶4 This court concludes: (1) Deborah
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4682 - 2005-03-31
“was not so egregious as to warrant termination.” ¶4 This court concludes: (1) Deborah
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4682 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deborah E. - 2001AP003305
“was not so egregious as to warrant termination.” ¶4 This court concludes: (1) Deborah
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4679 - 2005-03-31
“was not so egregious as to warrant termination.” ¶4 This court concludes: (1) Deborah
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4679 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deborah E. - 2001AP003304
“was not so egregious as to warrant termination.” ¶4 This court concludes: (1) Deborah
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4678 - 2005-03-31
“was not so egregious as to warrant termination.” ¶4 This court concludes: (1) Deborah
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4678 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Alan M. Hoffmann - 2021AP001170
of the juror’s encounter with Hoffman were not sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a mistrial. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601012 - 2022-12-15
of the juror’s encounter with Hoffman were not sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a mistrial. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601012 - 2022-12-15