Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2271 - 2280 of 66207 for did.
Search results 2271 - 2280 of 66207 for did.
State v. Aneudy Solis-Fuentes - 2012AP001297
that the search warrant affidavit did not support a finding of probable cause. There is no merit to this issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107037 - 2014-01-16
that the search warrant affidavit did not support a finding of probable cause. There is no merit to this issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107037 - 2014-01-16
[PDF]
State v. Steven N. Loomis - 2014AP001361
agreement terms related to sentencing, and the court did not ask Loomis whether he understood the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142475 - 2017-09-21
agreement terms related to sentencing, and the court did not ask Loomis whether he understood the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142475 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brandon W. Harris - 2006AP000582
Harris with the diary entries. Larkowski testified that she stated to Harris, “Thank goodness this did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27091 - 2014-09-15
Harris with the diary entries. Larkowski testified that she stated to Harris, “Thank goodness this did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27091 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Justin H. - 2009AP002935
did not assault Sylindria when the petition alleged he did. His counsel asserted, “[The petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51490 - 2014-09-15
did not assault Sylindria when the petition alleged he did. His counsel asserted, “[The petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51490 - 2014-09-15
State v. Douglas R. Pedersen - 1994AP001651
). Pedersen does not dispute the sufficiency of the evidence. However, he claims that the State did not prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7931 - 2005-03-31
). Pedersen does not dispute the sufficiency of the evidence. However, he claims that the State did not prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7931 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael G. Hauck - 2007AP002915
enhanced by a prior conviction that is invalid because he did not knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33255 - 2014-09-15
enhanced by a prior conviction that is invalid because he did not knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33255 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Douglas R. Pedersen - 1994AP001651
of the evidence. However, he claims that the State did not prove specific intent because he did not intend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7931 - 2017-09-19
of the evidence. However, he claims that the State did not prove specific intent because he did not intend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7931 - 2017-09-19
State v. John R. Calkins - 2003AP002578
he did not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waive his right to counsel in the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6922 - 2005-03-31
he did not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waive his right to counsel in the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6922 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brandon W. Harris - 2006AP000582
testified that she stated to Harris, “Thank goodness this did not result in intercourse,” to which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27091 - 2006-11-13
testified that she stated to Harris, “Thank goodness this did not result in intercourse,” to which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27091 - 2006-11-13
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
, she did not specifically use that term, nor did she cite any case law or legal standard that would
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=743&year=2016
, she did not specifically use that term, nor did she cite any case law or legal standard that would
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=743&year=2016