Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2241 - 2250 of 68446 for did.
Search results 2241 - 2250 of 68446 for did.
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. Because the circuit court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113746 - 2014-06-10
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. Because the circuit court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113746 - 2014-06-10
State v. Tong T.
that, “[t]he important thing is that I want my daughters to forgive me for if I did something wrong, and I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5687 - 2005-03-31
that, “[t]he important thing is that I want my daughters to forgive me for if I did something wrong, and I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5687 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Douglas R. Pedersen
of the evidence. However, he claims that the State did not prove specific intent because he did not intend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7931 - 2017-09-19
of the evidence. However, he claims that the State did not prove specific intent because he did not intend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7931 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Tong T.
to forgive me for if I did something wrong, and I forgive them for what they did wrong and I want to start
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5687 - 2017-09-19
to forgive me for if I did something wrong, and I forgive them for what they did wrong and I want to start
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5687 - 2017-09-19
State v. Joseph L. Egerson
on a city street for a period of time did not violate Egerson’s Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13606 - 2005-03-31
on a city street for a period of time did not violate Egerson’s Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13606 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
testified that she stated to Harris, “Thank goodness this did not result in intercourse,” to which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27091 - 2006-11-13
testified that she stated to Harris, “Thank goodness this did not result in intercourse,” to which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27091 - 2006-11-13
[PDF]
State v. Joseph L. Egerson
of time did not violate Egerson’s Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment to the United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13606 - 2017-09-21
of time did not violate Egerson’s Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment to the United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13606 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jennifer Vian
of Jennifer Vian and what she said she did and did not do to the children.” Counsel did not object to what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10575 - 2017-09-20
of Jennifer Vian and what she said she did and did not do to the children.” Counsel did not object to what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10575 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Collins
controversy was not tried because trial counsel did not object to certain testimony of the victim’s mother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4439 - 2017-09-19
controversy was not tried because trial counsel did not object to certain testimony of the victim’s mother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4439 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
enhanced by a prior conviction that is invalid because he did not knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33255 - 2014-09-15
enhanced by a prior conviction that is invalid because he did not knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33255 - 2014-09-15