Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2221 - 2230 of 68458 for did.
Search results 2221 - 2230 of 68458 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
motion because it did not adopt the statutory presumption that there has been a substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35484 - 2009-02-10
motion because it did not adopt the statutory presumption that there has been a substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35484 - 2009-02-10
[PDF]
State v. Edward J. Thompson
that this caused him to believe he did not have to No. 98-0156 2 consent to the test until he actually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13532 - 2017-09-21
that this caused him to believe he did not have to No. 98-0156 2 consent to the test until he actually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13532 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Hoefs
erroneously exercised its discretion because it did not consider certain sentencing guidelines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8223 - 2017-09-19
erroneously exercised its discretion because it did not consider certain sentencing guidelines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8223 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael J. Rice
jail. He contends that he was denied due process of law because he did not have the proper opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9120 - 2005-03-31
jail. He contends that he was denied due process of law because he did not have the proper opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9120 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the family court erred when it denied his motion because it did not adopt the statutory No. 2008AP2418
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35484 - 2014-09-15
that the family court erred when it denied his motion because it did not adopt the statutory No. 2008AP2418
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35484 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
do not address them. Instead, Henderson argues that he did not receive proper notice of when the time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95873 - 2013-04-21
do not address them. Instead, Henderson argues that he did not receive proper notice of when the time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95873 - 2013-04-21
COURT OF APPEALS
did not adequately allege all of the elements of the crime; (2) that the jury instructions did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30407 - 2007-09-26
did not adequately allege all of the elements of the crime; (2) that the jury instructions did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30407 - 2007-09-26
COURT OF APPEALS
was charged with OMVWI subsequent to a traffic stop on March 29, 2012. Ardell did not appear at the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92329 - 2013-02-05
was charged with OMVWI subsequent to a traffic stop on March 29, 2012. Ardell did not appear at the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92329 - 2013-02-05
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Rice
jail. He contends that he was denied due process of law because he did not have the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9120 - 2017-09-19
jail. He contends that he was denied due process of law because he did not have the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9120 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did not fully explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73689 - 2014-09-15
argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did not fully explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73689 - 2014-09-15