Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2211 - 2220 of 6167 for cv-550.

Richard Herbert Voigt v. City of Merrill - 2001AP002191
. Appeal No. 01-2191 Cir. Ct. No. 99-CV-152 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4304 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Richard Herbert Voigt v. City of Merrill - 2001AP002191
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 01-2191 Cir. Ct. No. 99-CV-152 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4304 - 2017-09-19

Aiken & Scoptur v. John Brendel - 2001AP002220
. Appeal No. 01-2220 Cir. Ct. No. 00-CV-1801 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4314 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Kathryn M. McCabe v. Gerald Robert McCabe - 2002AP000090
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-0090 Cir. Ct. No. 00-CV-587 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4822 - 2017-09-19

Michael Zieve v. Jack R. Hayes - 2002AP000235
. Appeal No. 02-0235 Cir. Ct. No. 00-CV-199 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4878 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Michael E. Stoetzel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment - 2002AP000330
. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-0330 Cir. Ct. No. 00-CV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4911 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Associated Bank v. Lawrence Pufall - 2002AP000205
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-0205-FT Cir. Ct. No. 00-CV-10 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4864 - 2017-09-19

Wesley Rathburn v. Dallas - 2002AP001467
. Appeal No. 02-1467 Cir. Ct. No. 01-CV-631 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5304 - 2005-03-31

Wisconsin Court System - eFile/eCourts
, Affidavit of Indigency and Order (CV-410) is filed and the petition is granted, the fee waiver will be valid
/ecourts/efilecircuit/eupdates/eupdate06.htm - 2024-09-30

State v. Belinda Johnson - 2005AP002383
, 364 N.W.2d 550 (Ct. App. 1985). The court must give a “rational and explainable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32710 - 2008-05-20