Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2201 - 2210 of 68458 for did.
Search results 2201 - 2210 of 68458 for did.
State v. Bruce Hoefs
. Hoefs argues that the court erroneously exercised its discretion because it did not consider certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8223 - 2005-03-31
. Hoefs argues that the court erroneously exercised its discretion because it did not consider certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8223 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
be allowed to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did not fully explain the meaning of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73689 - 2011-11-14
be allowed to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did not fully explain the meaning of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73689 - 2011-11-14
[PDF]
Irma T. Wiedmeyer v. Doris E. Carriveau
in dismissing the case. We conclude that it did not. Accordingly, we affirm. No(s). 98-1359-FT 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14009 - 2014-09-15
in dismissing the case. We conclude that it did not. Accordingly, we affirm. No(s). 98-1359-FT 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14009 - 2014-09-15
Shirell Watkins, Sr. v. Gerald A. Berge
to prepare his defense. The sealed submission did not hamper the circuit court’s review of the certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25614 - 2006-06-21
to prepare his defense. The sealed submission did not hamper the circuit court’s review of the certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25614 - 2006-06-21
Lois Kroener v. State of Wisconsin Employe Trust Funds Board
Kroener’s action because she did not serve a summons on the Board. Because the failure to serve and file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14497 - 2005-03-31
Kroener’s action because she did not serve a summons on the Board. Because the failure to serve and file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14497 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lorenzo S. Balli
presented in the complaint did not support a charge of attempted escape because they did not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3181 - 2017-09-19
presented in the complaint did not support a charge of attempted escape because they did not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3181 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not file a direct appeal from his conviction. On November 28, 2011, he filed a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92964 - 2014-09-15
did not file a direct appeal from his conviction. On November 28, 2011, he filed a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92964 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was not seized, then the officer did not need reasonable suspicion to approach his vehicle. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517947 - 2022-05-05
was not seized, then the officer did not need reasonable suspicion to approach his vehicle. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517947 - 2022-05-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
argues: (1) that the complaint did not adequately allege all of the elements of the crime; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30407 - 2014-09-15
argues: (1) that the complaint did not adequately allege all of the elements of the crime; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30407 - 2014-09-15
State v. Walter J. Griffin
issue is whether the trial court erred in its determination that the State did not breach a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2006-03-22
issue is whether the trial court erred in its determination that the State did not breach a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2006-03-22

